Is Mile High Compounds trustworthy?

PepIndex scores Mile High Compounds 65.4 of 100 on 94% data coverage, ranked 34 of 55, computed from the sourced data points on its profile. Re-analysis of the published site located 14 certificate records and wrote 12 mapped to tracked compounds. 6 strengths and 2 weaknesses recorded from the findings.

Does Mile High Compounds publish third-party lab testing?

The named testing laboratory is Laboratory A, verified against the certificates we read. Certificates can be read without an account. PepIndex has indexed 12 certificate records for this vendor. A vendor-published certificate is treated as a claim, not as corroboration.

What compounds does Mile High Compounds list?

Mile High Compounds lists 0 of the compounds tracked in this index. Catalog contents are recorded from the vendor's own listing pages on the date shown.

Rank 34 of 55Data current · 36d ago

Mile High Compounds

Re-analysis of the published site located 14 certificate records and wrote 12 mapped to tracked compounds. 6 strengths and 2 weaknesses recorded from the findings.

Last verified 3 Aug 2026 · 12 certificate records · rubric v1.10.0 · milehighcompounds.is

Visit Mile High Compounds

65.4

PepIndex score

65.4 / 100

3.3/ 5Partly documented

Data coverage

94%

Coverage is the share of scored fields we hold and corroborated for Mile High Compounds. A score built on a handful of unchecked claims and a score built on forty verified data points are not the same finding, so both numbers are always published together. How coverage is computed.

Strengths

Publishes 129 lot-specific certificates across its catalogue
Certificates are readable publicly, without an account
Testing laboratory named on certificates (Laboratory A)
Operates under a named legal entity (Mile High Compounds LLC)
Publishes a physical postal address
Prices are visible without an account

Weaknesses

No ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation recorded for the testing lab
No independent third-party reviews located

Regulatory & enforcement record

Authority actions on record against this vendor. Issued by regulators and publicly verifiable — unlike self-reported reviews, these cannot be manufactured, which is why they, and not reviews, drive the track-record score.

Warning letterFDA · 2026-03-31
FDA warning letter to Mile High Compounds LLC for offering unapproved new drugs (GLP-1 SM, GLP-2 TRZ, GLP-3 RT, and BAC Water) for sale on milehighcompounds.is in violation of sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the FD&C Act.
Source →

Recorded data pointsEvery field with its source, capture date and whether we corroborated it8 verified10 claimed1 not recordedView all →

A tag of verified means we opened the cited source and confirmed the value; published means we recorded the vendor’s own published information, taken at face value. Both count in full; only a value with no checkable source earns nothing. Fields older than 90 days are marked stale.

Testing

Testing laboratory: Laboratory AVerified3 Aug 2026sourceLaboratory read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “Laboratory named on the certificate document: Laboratory A.”
ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation: Not recordedNot recorded
Certificate granularity: Per batchPublished3 Aug 2026sourceBatch-level certificates described by the vendor; no lot-specific certificate was reachable. Evidence: “…irst company to deploy “8x” Testing now over 1 year ago. We provide Certificates of Analysis (COAs) for every batch. What happens if my package is l…”
Certificate accessibility: publicVerified3 Aug 2026editorial checkCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.”
Labeled vs. actual mg published: YesVerified3 Aug 2026sourceLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 30 mg, assayed 29.5 mg, purity 98% (lot RETA-30-03, Laboratory B).”
Historical certificates retained: YesVerified3 Aug 2026editorial checkSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “129 certificate documents reachable across 14 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.”

Business

Website: https://milehighcompounds.isVerified3 Aug 2026sourceConfirmed reachable by the analysis run. Evidence: “Origin resolved and fetched: https://milehighcompounds.is”
Legal entity: Mile High Compounds LLCPublished3 Aug 2026sourceEntity name as published by the vendor. Not checked against a corporate registry. Evidence: “…ditions. These terms govern all purchases and use of materials obtained through Mile High Compounds LLC (“Mile High Compounds,” “we,” &#…”
Country: Not recordedNot recorded
Physical address: 215 S Wadsworth Blvd Unit 400 #613, Lakewood, CO 80226Published3 Aug 2026sourcePublished by the vendor. Confirmed present on the page; not independently confirmed as an operating location. Evidence: “…in Military & First Responder Discount Get In Touch [email protected] 215 S Wadsworth Blvd Unit 400 #613, Lakewood, CO 80226 CO 80226 Get In Touch Ple…”
Contact channels: Email (support@milehighcompounds.is)Published3 Aug 2026sourceContact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “support@milehighcompounds.is”

Commercial

Pricing: ungatedVerified3 Aug 2026sourcePrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…ty, consistency, and confidence in your research. Free Shipping For Orders Over $300 (Discounts Included!) We offer free FedEx Expedited Shipping on US orders o…”
Payment methods: Bank transferPublished3 Aug 2026sourcePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…time. What payment methods do you accept? We accept all Major Credit Cards and Bank Transfer for your convenience. Elevate Your Research With Confidence Every…”
Guarantee / reship policy: Case by caseVerified3 Aug 2026sourceA replacement is offered but the published policy reserves discretion to deny claims. Evidence: “…ers may be refused, canceled, or issued store credit in lieu of a refund at our sole discretion if we suspect: (a) Misuse or intended misuse of products; (b) Hi…”

Track record

Independent reviews located: Not recordedNot recorded
Mean sentiment (0–5): Not recordedNot recorded
Complaint pattern: Not recordedNot recorded

Certificate recordsLot-level results with labeled versus assayed mass12 lots3.0% mean deviationView all →

Discrepancy is computed as the absolute difference between labeled and assayed mass, divided by the labeled mass. A vendor-published certificate is a claim; only an independently commissioned assay is treated as corroboration.

Compound	Lot	Tested	Lab	Labeled	Assayed	Discrepancy	Purity	Source
MOTS-c	KVR-2026-4DAB54	1 Jun 2026	Cohen Lab, USC	40 mg	35.2 mg	12.0%	99.0%	Vendor-published
MOTS-c	MOT-010-MH-03	5 May 2026	Mile High Compounds	10 mg	9.8 mg	2.0%	98.5%	Vendor-published
MOTS-c	MOT-040-MH-01	5 May 2026	Mile High Compounds	40 mg	39.5 mg	1.3%	99.1%	Vendor-published
Retatrutide	GLP-310-MH-03	4 Oct 2025	Independent Testing Facility	10 mg	9.8 mg	2.0%	99.5%	Vendor-published
Retatrutide	RTG-050-MH-01	3 Oct 2025	ABC Labs	10 mg	10.1 mg	1.0%	99.2%	Vendor-published
Kisspeptin	KSP-010-MH-02	15 Jun 2025	Independent Lab B	10 mg	9.6 mg	4.0%	98.0%	Vendor-published
Selank	SLK-010-MH-04	10 May 2025	Mile High Compounds	10 mg	9.9 mg	1.0%	99.0%	Vendor-published
Selank	SLK-010-MH-03	1 May 2025	Mile High Compounds	10 mg	9.8 mg	2.0%	99.0%	Vendor-published
Cagrilintide	CAG-010-MH-03	1 May 2025	Mile High Compounds	10 mg	9.8 mg	2.0%	99.0%	Vendor-published
KPV	KCP-500-MH-02	1 Apr 2025	Independent Third-Party Lab	30 mg	30.5 mg	1.7%	99.0%	Vendor-published
Kisspeptin	KSP-010-MH-01	10 Mar 2025	Independent Lab A	10 mg	9.5 mg	5.0%	99.0%	Vendor-published
KPV	KCP-500-MH-01	1 Mar 2025	Independent Third-Party Lab	30 mg	29.5 mg	1.7%	99.0%	Vendor-published

Compounds carried

What the research says about what Mile High Compounds sells

A vendor’s score measures what it can demonstrate about its testing. It says nothing about whether the compounds it lists have evidence behind them — those are separate questions, and the digests above answer the second one.

How this score was calculatedEvery signal, its weight and the arithmetic — reconstructable by handrubric v1.10.0View calculation →

Each criterion is scored out of 100 over the signals we could assess, then weighted into the overall figure. Within a criterion, a signal contributes weight × merit × credit: merit is how good the recorded value is, credit is what its provenance earns — 1.00 for a value with a checkable source, 0 for a value recorded without one. A missing signal counts as a partial gap — half its weight — so a vendor that publishes what others leave blank scores higher, while a blank still costs; a value recorded without a source counts in full and earns nothing, so omitting one can never raise a score. A criterion with no data at all — track record when no independent reviews are locatable — is set aside and the remaining weights renormalised; the coverage figure, shown alongside, reports how complete the assessment is.

Testing transparency

45.3 / 100 · weight 26% → 11.8

Is the testing lab named? Is it ISO/IEC 17025 accredited? Are certificates of analysis lot-specific, and can anyone read them without an account?

Signal	Recorded value	Provenance	Weight	Merit	Credit	Points
Testing lab is namedA specific laboratory is identified, so the assay can be traced.	Laboratory ALaboratory read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “Laboratory named on the certificate document: Laboratory A.”	Verified3 Aug 2026 · source	1	1.00	1.00	1.00 / 1
Lab holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditationNot recorded.	—	Not recorded	4	0.00	not recorded	0.00 / 4
Certificate granularityCertificates cover a batch rather than an individual lot.	Per batchBatch-level certificates described by the vendor; no lot-specific certificate was reachable. Evidence: “…irst company to deploy “8x” Testing now over 1 year ago. We provide Certificates of Analysis (COAs) for every batch. What happens if my package is l…”	Published3 Aug 2026 · source	3	0.60	1.00	1.80 / 3
Certificates readable without an accountAnyone, including us, can read the certificates without registering.	PublicCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.”	Verified3 Aug 2026	4	1.00	1.00	4.00 / 4
Recognised testing laboratory1 of 12 certificates name a real, identifiable testing laboratory (a known lab, or a clearly independent one). Certificates with no named lab, or where the "lab" is just the vendor's own name, do not count — anyone can print those.	1 / 12 recognised lab	PublishedStale1 Jun 2026 · source	6	0.08	1.00 × 0.9 stale	0.45 / 6
Testing transparency subtotal · coverage 78%						7.25 / 18

Documentation depth

90.8 / 100 · weight 22% → 20

Does the vendor publish labeled-versus-actual milligram figures, retain historical certificates, and how large are the discrepancies we can measure?

Signal	Recorded value	Provenance	Weight	Merit	Credit	Points
Labeled vs. actual mg publishedQuantitative fill data is published, not only a purity percentage.	PublishedLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 30 mg, assayed 29.5 mg, purity 98% (lot RETA-30-03, Laboratory B).”	Verified3 Aug 2026 · source	1	1.00	1.00	1.00 / 1
Historical certificates retainedPast certificates remain accessible, so consistency over time can be checked.	RetainedSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “129 certificate documents reachable across 14 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.”	Verified3 Aug 2026	3	1.00	1.00	3.00 / 3
Certificates the vendor publishes129 certificates located, 12 of them indexed with readable results; full credit at six.	129 published, 12 indexed	PublishedStale1 Jun 2026 · source	7	1.00	1.00 × 0.9 stale	6.30 / 7
Labeled vs. actual discrepancyMean absolute deviation between labeled and assayed mass across 12 certificates. Zero scores full marks; 10% or worse scores nothing.	3.0% mean	PublishedStale1 Jun 2026 · source	1	0.70	1.00 × 0.9 stale	0.63 / 1
Certificate recencyThe most recent certificate is dated 2026-06-01, about 3 months ago. Certificates within a year score full marks; two years or older scores nothing.	newest 2026-06-01	PublishedStale1 Jun 2026 · source	4	1.00	1.00 × 0.9 stale	3.60 / 4
Documentation depth subtotal · coverage 100%						14.53 / 16

Price & value

71.7 / 100 · weight 20% → 14.3

How the vendor’s per-milligram prices for a standard basket of common compounds compare to the market. Priced below the peer median scores higher; well above it scores lower. An overpriced vendor cannot outrank a comparably documented, better-priced one.

Signal	Recorded value	Provenance	Weight	Merit	Credit	Points
Price vs market ($/mg)Priced about 7% below the peer median per milligram across a standard basket — better value than the typical vendor.	93% of medianPrice index 93.3% of peer median across 19 compounds (1 outlier dropped): kpv $8/mg, dsip $5/mg, semax $4/mg, ss-31 $7/mg, ghk-cu $1/mg, mots-c $4.67/mg, pt-141 $4.5/mg, selank $6.5/mg.	Verified31 Aug 2026 · source	10	0.72	1.00	7.17 / 10
Price & value subtotal · coverage 100%						7.17 / 10

Track record

35 / 100 · weight 12% → 4.2

Adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges. Authority-issued and publicly verifiable. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored: for this market they can be manufactured.

Signal	Recorded value	Provenance	Weight	Merit	Credit	Points
Regulatory & enforcement record1 adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record (most serious: warning letter). These are issued by authorities and publicly verifiable.	1 action1 enforcement action(s) on record.	Verified5 Aug 2026 · source	10	0.35	1.00	3.50 / 10
Track record subtotal · coverage 100%						3.50 / 10

Business transparency

85.7 / 100 · weight 12% → 10.3

Is a legal entity named, is there a physical address, and can the vendor be reached?

Signal	Recorded value	Provenance	Weight	Merit	Credit	Points
Named legal entityA registered entity is named, so there is someone to hold responsible.	Mile High Compounds LLCEntity name as published by the vendor. Not checked against a corporate registry. Evidence: “…ditions. These terms govern all purchases and use of materials obtained through Mile High Compounds LLC (“Mile High Compounds,” “we,” &#…”	Published3 Aug 2026 · source	3	1.00	1.00	3.00 / 3
Physical address publishedA postal address is published.	215 S Wadsworth Blvd Unit 400 #613, Lakewood, CO 80226Published by the vendor. Confirmed present on the page; not independently confirmed as an operating location. Evidence: “…in Military & First Responder Discount Get In Touch [email protected] 215 S Wadsworth Blvd Unit 400 #613, Lakewood, CO 80226 CO 80226 Get In Touch Ple…”	Published3 Aug 2026 · source	2	1.00	1.00	2.00 / 2
Contact channelsDistinct contact routes we could identify. Full credit at two.	Email (support@milehighcompounds.is)Contact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “support@milehighcompounds.is”	Published3 Aug 2026 · source	2	0.50	1.00	1.00 / 2
Business transparency subtotal · coverage 100%						6.00 / 7

Commercial clarity

59.8 / 100 · weight 8% → 4.8

Is pricing visible without an account, is there a stated guarantee or reship policy, and are payment methods disclosed?

Signal	Recorded value	Provenance	Weight	Merit	Credit	Points
Pricing visible without an accountPrices are published openly and can be compared.	UngatedPrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…ty, consistency, and confidence in your research. Free Shipping For Orders Over $300 (Discounts Included!) We offer free FedEx Expedited Shipping on US orders o…”	Verified3 Aug 2026 · source	4	1.00	1.00	4.00 / 4
Guarantee / reship policyWhether the published policy states an outcome in advance or leaves it to discretion.	Case by caseA replacement is offered but the published policy reserves discretion to deny claims. Evidence: “…ers may be refused, canceled, or issued store credit in lieu of a refund at our sole discretion if we suspect: (a) Misuse or intended misuse of products; (b) Hi…”	Verified3 Aug 2026 · source	3	0.50	1.00	1.50 / 3
Payment methods disclosedDisclosed payment routes. Full credit at three.	Bank transferPayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…time. What payment methods do you accept? We accept all Major Credit Cards and Bank Transfer for your convenience. Elevate Your Research With Confidence Every…”	Published3 Aug 2026 · source	1	0.33	1.00	0.33 / 1
Payment offers buyer recourseOnly irreversible payment methods are listed (crypto, transfer, Zelle). No chargeback recourse, which is a common scam pattern.	Irreversible onlyPayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…time. What payment methods do you accept? We accept all Major Credit Cards and Bank Transfer for your convenience. Elevate Your Research With Confidence Every…”	Published3 Aug 2026 · source	3	0.25	1.00	0.75 / 3
Commercial clarity subtotal · coverage 100%						6.58 / 11

Total

Criterion	Subscore	Weight	Contribution	Coverage
Testing transparency	45.3	26%	11.8	78%
Documentation depth	90.8	22%	20	100%
Price & value	71.7	20%	14.3	100%
Track record	35	12%	4.2	100%
Business transparency	85.7	12%	10.3	100%
Commercial clarity	59.8	8%	4.8	100%
Computed score		100%	65.4	94%

Rubric v1.10.0 · 8 verified, 10 claimed, 0 unsourced, 1 not recorded, 4 stale of 19 scored signals

Community

Reviews

Reader reviews are community context only — they are never part of Mile High Compounds’s computed PepIndex score, which is built from evidence alone.

No reviews yet. .