Laboratories
Who actually signed the certificates
13 analytical laboratories are named on the 627 certificates behind these rankings. 7 of them publish a public lookup, which is what lets a buyer confirm a report at the laboratory instead of trusting the copy on the vendor's website; those 7 account for 513 of the 627. A further 37 records we hold name no laboratory a reader could check, and are listed below rather than counted. PepIndex is an independent index of research-peptide vendors; no laboratory or vendor pays to appear here.
13 laboratories · 627 certificates · 7 with a public lookup · 2 claiming ISO/IEC 17025
Every laboratory on record
| Laboratory | Location | Certificates | Vendors | Mean purity | Newest assay | Public lookup | ISO 17025, lab’s own claim | ISO 17025, attributed by vendors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Diagnostics Testing | Franklin, Tennessee | 272 | 13 | 99.67% | 21 Sept 2026 | Yes | No claim on its site | By ZC Labs |
| ILS Laboratories | San Diego, California | 173 | 5 | 99.61% | 30 Sept 2026 | Yes | Claimed on its own site | By Next Gen Peptides |
| MZ Biolabs | Tucson, Arizona | 30 | 1 | 99.64% | 10 Apr 2026 | Not found | No claim on its site | Not attributed |
| AV Analytics | — | 29 | 1 | 99.78% | 3 Sept 2026 | Not found | Not checked | Not attributed |
| United Laboratories | — | 27 | 1 | 99.64% | 18 Sept 2026 | Yes | No claim on its site | Not attributed |
| KMD Analytical (KMD Group LLC) | Chatsworth, California | 22 | 1 | 99.62% | 17 Sept 2026 | Yes | No claim on its site | Not attributed |
| Vanguard Laboratory | Olympia, Washington | 18 | 3 | 99.43% | 15 Jun 2026 | Not found | Claimed on its own site | Not attributed |
| BTLabs | — | 17 | 1 | 99.74% | 10 Jul 2026 | Not found | No claim on its site | By Curo |
| Bioviridian Inc. | College Station, Texas | 14 | 2 | 99.79% | 4 Sept 2026 | Yes | No claim on its site | Not attributed |
| Kovera Labs | — | 11 | 3 | 99.61% | 22 Jul 2026 | Not found | No claim on its site | Not attributed |
| Horizon Analytical | — | 9 | 2 | 99.31% | 3 Jun 2026 | Not found | No claim on its site | Not attributed |
| Janoshik Analytical | Czech Republic | 4 | 2 | 99.82% | 24 Apr 2026 | Yes | Not checked | Not attributed |
| Krause Analytical LLC | Austin, Texas | 1 | 1 | 99.90% | 9 Apr 2026 | Yes | No claim on its site | Not attributed |
Records that name no checkable laboratory
A certificate whose laboratory field holds the vendor’s own name, a placeholder, or a name no laboratory can be traced to is a real record of a document we read, but it is not evidence of third-party testing. These records stay on the vendor profiles and compound pages, marked as such, and are not counted toward any laboratory above.
| What the field holds | As printed | Records | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|
| The vendor’s own name | hydroresearchpeptides.com | 9 | Hydro Research Peptides |
| The vendor’s own name | Mile High Compounds | 5 | MHMile High Compounds |
| The vendor’s own name | Evolabs Research | 2 | Evo Labs Research |
| The vendor’s own name | Hydro Research Peptides | 1 | Hydro Research Peptides |
| Name could not be traced | Richard Sylvester MD | 4 | EPExtreme Peptides |
| Name could not be traced | Cohen Lab, USC | 1 | MHMile High Compounds |
| Name could not be traced | Hydro Research Labs | 1 | Hydro Research Peptides |
| No laboratory named | Principal Chemist | 3 | Koi Peptides, IPImproved Peptides |
| No laboratory named | Independent Third-Party Lab | 2 | MHMile High Compounds |
| No laboratory named | Not named on certificate | 2 | IPImproved Peptides |
| No laboratory named | ABC Labs | 1 | MHMile High Compounds |
| No laboratory named | Confirmed | 1 | IPImproved Peptides |
| No laboratory named | Independent Lab A | 1 | MHMile High Compounds |
| No laboratory named | Independent Lab B | 1 | MHMile High Compounds |
| No laboratory named | Independent Testing Facility | 1 | MHMile High Compounds |
| No laboratory named | Laboratory | 1 | Simple Peptide |
| No laboratory named | Not provided | 1 | Koi Peptides |
How to read this table
Certificate count is how many lots that laboratory signed among the documents we have read. It reflects which vendors we cover and how much each publishes, so it measures our coverage of the laboratory, not the laboratory’s size.
Mean purity is the average of what those certificates reported. It describes the samples the laboratory received. A high figure says those lots assayed well; it is not a rating of the laboratory and cannot be read as one.
Accreditation is stated twice because it comes from two places. The laboratory’s own claim is what its website says, read on the date shown on its profile; a claim is recorded as the laboratory’s until it names an accreditation body and a certificate that can be looked up there. The vendor attribution is narrower still: a vendor that records ISO/IEC 17025 for its testing laboratory tells us which laboratory is accredited only when it uses one. Where a vendor uses several, its claim is left unattributed rather than shared out among them, because the certificate does not say which bench it belongs to.



