Evo Labs Research
Re-analysis of the published site located 22 certificate records and wrote 21 mapped to tracked compounds. 6 strengths and 3 weaknesses recorded from the findings.
Last verified · 3 certificate records · rubric v1.10.0 · evolabsresearch.co
PepIndex score
75.7 / 100
3.8/ 5Well documentedData coverage
89%
Coverage is the share of scored fields we hold and corroborated for Evo Labs Research. A score built on a handful of unchecked claims and a score built on forty verified data points are not the same finding, so both numbers are always published together. How coverage is computed.
Strengths
- Publishes 58 lot-specific certificates across its catalogue
- Certificates are readable publicly, without an account
- Testing laboratory named on certificates (Kovera Labs)
- Publishes a physical postal address
- Prices are visible without an account
- Retains historical certificates for comparison over time
Weaknesses
- No ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation recorded for the testing lab
- No registered legal entity is disclosed
- No independent third-party reviews located
Regulatory & enforcement record
No adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. We record authority actions — FDA warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — when located. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured.
Recorded data pointsEvery field with its source, capture date and whether we corroborated it9 verified8 claimed2 not recordedView all →Hide ↑
A tag of verified means we opened the cited source and confirmed the value; published means we recorded the vendor’s own published information, taken at face value. Both count in full; only a value with no checkable source earns nothing. Fields older than 90 days are marked stale.
Testing
- Testing laboratory
- Kovera LabsVerified3 Aug 2026sourceLaboratory read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “Laboratory named on the certificate document: Kovera Labs.”
- ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Certificate granularity
- Per lotVerified3 Aug 2026sourceLot-specific certificates observed directly. Evidence: “Certificates carry lot identifiers tied to individual product variants.”
- Certificate accessibility
- publicVerified3 Aug 2026editorial checkCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.”
- Labeled vs. actual mg published
- YesVerified3 Aug 2026sourceLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 10 mg, assayed 11.57 mg, purity 99.721% (lot EVO5212026, Kovera Labs).”
- Historical certificates retained
- YesVerified3 Aug 2026sourceSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “58 certificate documents reachable across 3 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.”
Business
- Website
- https://evolabsresearch.coVerified3 Aug 2026sourceConfirmed reachable by the analysis run. Evidence: “Origin resolved and fetched: https://evolabsresearch.co”
- Legal entity
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Country
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Physical address
- 8270 Woodland Center Blvd, Tampa, FL 33614Published3 Aug 2026sourcePublished by the vendor. Confirmed present on the page; not independently confirmed as an operating location. Evidence: “…ite constitutes your acceptance of any changes. 13. Contact EVO Labs Research · 8270 Woodland Center Blvd, Tampa, FL 33614 Email: support@evolabsresearch.co Pri…”
- Contact channels
- Email (support@evolabsresearch.co), Telephone 813-694-9340Published3 Aug 2026sourceContact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “support@evolabsresearch.co · 813-694-9340”
Commercial
- Pricing
- ungatedVerified3 Aug 2026sourcePrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…ducts → Best Seller GLP-3 (R) View Research → GLP-1 Research Peptides GLP-3 (R) $49.99 $44.99 with EVO+ Black Add to Cart GHK-CU View Research → Longevity & Cel…”
- Payment methods
- Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Bank transfer, PayPal, Apple Pay, Google PayPublished3 Aug 2026sourcePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…y as defined under Section 503B. © 2026 EVO Labs Research. All rights reserved. VISA AMEX Klarna 🔒 SSL Your Cart Your cart is empty Explore research peptides t…”
- Guarantee / reship policy
- Case by caseVerified3 Aug 2026sourceA replacement is offered but the published policy reserves discretion to deny claims. Evidence: “…pping charges and package protection fees are non-refundable. EVO Labs Research reserves the right to deny a return, refund, replacement, or claim that falls ou…”
Track record
- Independent reviews located
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Mean sentiment (0–5)
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Complaint pattern
- Not recordedNot recorded
Certificate recordsLot-level results with labeled versus assayed mass3 lots9.5% mean deviationView all →Hide ↑
Discrepancy is computed as the absolute difference between labeled and assayed mass, divided by the labeled mass. A vendor-published certificate is a claim; only an independently commissioned assay is treated as corroboration.
| Compound | Lot | Tested | Lab | Labeled | Assayed | Discrepancy | Purity | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNAP-8 | EVO5212026 | Kovera Labs | 10 mg | 11.57 mg | 15.7% | 99.7% | Vendor-published | |
| SNAP-8 | 201125 | Evolabs Research | 10 mg | 10.17 mg | 1.7% | 99.1% | Vendor-published | |
| DSIP | 0010825 | Evolabs Research | 15 mg | 16.68 mg | 11.2% | 99.4% | Vendor-published |
Compounds carried
What the research says about what Evo Labs Research sells
DSIP
What the research on DSIP actually shows
3 not established
Glutathione
What the research on Glutathione actually shows
3 not established
IGF-1 LR3
What the research on IGF-1 LR3 actually shows
3 not established
PT-141
What the research on PT-141 actually shows
3 not established
SNAP-8
What the research on SNAP-8 actually shows
3 not established
A vendor’s score measures what it can demonstrate about its testing. It says nothing about whether the compounds it lists have evidence behind them — those are separate questions, and the digests above answer the second one.
How this score was calculatedEvery signal, its weight and the arithmetic — reconstructable by handrubric v1.10.0View calculation →Hide ↑
Each criterion is scored out of 100 over the signals we could assess, then weighted into the overall figure. Within a criterion, a signal contributes weight × merit × credit: merit is how good the recorded value is, credit is what its provenance earns — 1.00 for a value with a checkable source, 0 for a value recorded without one. A missing signal counts as a partial gap — half its weight — so a vendor that publishes what others leave blank scores higher, while a blank still costs; a value recorded without a source counts in full and earns nothing, so omitting one can never raise a score. A criterion with no data at all — track record when no independent reviews are locatable — is set aside and the remaining weights renormalised; the coverage figure, shown alongside, reports how complete the assessment is.
Testing transparency
61.3 / 100 · weight 26% → 15.9
Is the testing lab named? Is it ISO/IEC 17025 accredited? Are certificates of analysis lot-specific, and can anyone read them without an account?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing lab is namedA specific laboratory is identified, so the assay can be traced. | Kovera LabsLaboratory read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “Laboratory named on the certificate document: Kovera Labs.” | Verified3 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 / 1 |
| Lab holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditationNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 4 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 4 |
| Certificate granularityCertificates are lot-specific, so a certificate maps to the vial received. | Per lotLot-specific certificates observed directly. Evidence: “Certificates carry lot identifiers tied to individual product variants.” | Verified3 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 / 3 |
| Certificates readable without an accountAnyone, including us, can read the certificates without registering. | PublicCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.” | Verified3 Aug 2026 | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 / 4 |
| Recognised testing laboratory1 of 3 certificates name a real, identifiable testing laboratory (a known lab, or a clearly independent one). Certificates with no named lab, or where the "lab" is just the vendor's own name, do not count — anyone can print those. | 1 / 3 recognised lab | PublishedStale29 May 2026 · source | 6 | 0.33 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 1.80 / 6 |
| Testing transparency subtotal · coverage 78% | 9.80 / 18 | |||||
Documentation depth
87.1 / 100 · weight 22% → 19.2
Does the vendor publish labeled-versus-actual milligram figures, retain historical certificates, and how large are the discrepancies we can measure?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labeled vs. actual mg publishedQuantitative fill data is published, not only a purity percentage. | PublishedLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 10 mg, assayed 11.57 mg, purity 99.721% (lot EVO5212026, Kovera Labs).” | Verified3 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 / 1 |
| Historical certificates retainedPast certificates remain accessible, so consistency over time can be checked. | RetainedSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “58 certificate documents reachable across 3 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.” | Verified3 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 / 3 |
| Certificates the vendor publishes58 certificates located, 3 of them indexed with readable results; full credit at six. | 58 published, 3 indexed | PublishedStale29 May 2026 · source | 7 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 6.30 / 7 |
| Labeled vs. actual discrepancyMean absolute deviation between labeled and assayed mass across 3 certificates. Zero scores full marks; 10% or worse scores nothing. | 9.5% mean | PublishedStale29 May 2026 · source | 1 | 0.05 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.04 / 1 |
| Certificate recencyThe most recent certificate is dated 2026-05-29, about 3 months ago. Certificates within a year score full marks; two years or older scores nothing. | newest 2026-05-29 | PublishedStale29 May 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 3.60 / 4 |
| Documentation depth subtotal · coverage 100% | 13.94 / 16 | |||||
Price & value
65 / 100 · weight 20% → 13
How the vendor’s per-milligram prices for a standard basket of common compounds compare to the market. Priced below the peer median scores higher; well above it scores lower. An overpriced vendor cannot outrank a comparably documented, better-priced one.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price vs market ($/mg)Priced about 0% below the peer median per milligram across a standard basket — better value than the typical vendor. | 100% of medianPrice index 100% of peer median across 8 compounds (0 outliers dropped): pt-141 $6/mg, snap-8 $4/mg, dsip $2.33/mg, kpv $5/mg, ghrp-2 $10/mg, ghrp-6 $6/mg, ss-31 $7/mg, cerebrolysin $1.67/mg. | Verified31 Aug 2026 · source | 10 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 6.50 / 10 |
| Price & value subtotal · coverage 100% | 6.50 / 10 | |||||
Track record
100 / 100 · weight 12% → 12
Adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges. Authority-issued and publicly verifiable. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored: for this market they can be manufactured.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory & enforcement recordNo adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. Authority actions — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — are recorded here when located; self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured. | None on record | Verified8 Sept 2026 | 10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.00 / 10 |
| Track record subtotal · coverage 100% | 10.00 / 10 | |||||
Business transparency
72.7 / 100 · weight 12% → 8.7
Is a legal entity named, is there a physical address, and can the vendor be reached?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Named legal entityNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 3 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 3 |
| Physical address publishedA postal address is published. | 8270 Woodland Center Blvd, Tampa, FL 33614Published by the vendor. Confirmed present on the page; not independently confirmed as an operating location. Evidence: “…ite constitutes your acceptance of any changes. 13. Contact EVO Labs Research · 8270 Woodland Center Blvd, Tampa, FL 33614 Email: support@evolabsresearch.co Pri…” | Published3 Aug 2026 · source | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 / 2 |
| Contact channelsDistinct contact routes we could identify. Full credit at two. | Email (support@evolabsresearch.co), Telephone 813-694-9340Contact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “support@evolabsresearch.co · 813-694-9340” | Published3 Aug 2026 · source | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 / 2 |
| Business transparency subtotal · coverage 57% | 4.00 / 7 | |||||
Commercial clarity
86.4 / 100 · weight 8% → 6.9
Is pricing visible without an account, is there a stated guarantee or reship policy, and are payment methods disclosed?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing visible without an accountPrices are published openly and can be compared. | UngatedPrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…ducts → Best Seller GLP-3 (R) View Research → GLP-1 Research Peptides GLP-3 (R) $49.99 $44.99 with EVO+ Black Add to Cart GHK-CU View Research → Longevity & Cel…” | Verified3 Aug 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 / 4 |
| Guarantee / reship policyWhether the published policy states an outcome in advance or leaves it to discretion. | Case by caseA replacement is offered but the published policy reserves discretion to deny claims. Evidence: “…pping charges and package protection fees are non-refundable. EVO Labs Research reserves the right to deny a return, refund, replacement, or claim that falls ou…” | Verified3 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.50 / 3 |
| Payment methods disclosedDisclosed payment routes. Full credit at three. | Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Bank transfer, PayPal, Apple Pay, Google PayPayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…y as defined under Section 503B. © 2026 EVO Labs Research. All rights reserved. VISA AMEX Klarna 🔒 SSL Your Cart Your cart is empty Explore research peptides t…” | Published3 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 / 1 |
| Payment offers buyer recourseAccepts a payment method with buyer recourse — cards or wallets a processor underwrote, so a chargeback is possible if an order goes wrong. | Card / recoursePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…y as defined under Section 503B. © 2026 EVO Labs Research. All rights reserved. VISA AMEX Klarna 🔒 SSL Your Cart Your cart is empty Explore research peptides t…” | Published3 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 / 3 |
| Commercial clarity subtotal · coverage 100% | 9.50 / 11 | |||||
Total
| Criterion | Subscore | Weight | Contribution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing transparency | 61.3 | 26% | 15.9 | 78% |
| Documentation depth | 87.1 | 22% | 19.2 | 100% |
| Price & value | 65 | 20% | 13 | 100% |
| Track record | 100 | 12% | 12 | 100% |
| Business transparency | 72.7 | 12% | 8.7 | 57% |
| Commercial clarity | 86.4 | 8% | 6.9 | 100% |
| Computed score | 100% | 75.7 | 89% |
Rubric v1.10.0 · 9 verified, 8 claimed, 0 unsourced, 2 not recorded, 4 stale of 19 scored signals
Community
Reviews
Reader reviews are community context only — they are never part of Evo Labs Research’s computed PepIndex score, which is built from evidence alone.
No reviews yet. .