Evolve Peptides
Re-analysis of the published site located 0 certificate records and wrote 0 mapped to tracked compounds. 4 strengths and 5 weaknesses recorded from the findings.
Last verified · 0 certificate records · rubric v1.10.0 · www.evolvepeptides.com
PepIndex score
65.5 / 100
3.3/ 5Partly documentedData coverage
67%
Coverage is the share of scored fields we hold and corroborated for Evolve Peptides. A score built on a handful of unchecked claims and a score built on forty verified data points are not the same finding, so both numbers are always published together. How coverage is computed.
Strengths
- Publishes 94 lot-specific certificates across its catalogue
- Certificates are readable publicly, without an account
- Prices are visible without an account
- Retains historical certificates for comparison over time
Weaknesses
- Testing laboratory is not named on the certificates read
- No ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation recorded for the testing lab
- No registered legal entity is disclosed
- No physical postal address is published
- No independent third-party reviews located
Regulatory & enforcement record
No adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. We record authority actions — FDA warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — when located. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured.
Recorded data pointsEvery field with its source, capture date and whether we corroborated it7 verified4 claimed8 not recordedView all →Hide ↑
A tag of verified means we opened the cited source and confirmed the value; published means we recorded the vendor’s own published information, taken at face value. Both count in full; only a value with no checkable source earns nothing. Fields older than 90 days are marked stale.
Testing
- Testing laboratory
- Not recordedNot recorded
- ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Certificate granularity
- Per batchPublished1 Aug 2026sourceBatch-level certificates described by the vendor; no lot-specific certificate was reachable. Evidence: “…or research applications and ensure consistency, reliability, and purity. Every batch undergoes third-party testing with Certificates of Analysis available upon…”
- Certificate accessibility
- publicVerified1 Aug 2026editorial checkCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.”
- Labeled vs. actual mg published
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Historical certificates retained
- YesVerified1 Aug 2026editorial checkSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “94 certificate documents reachable across 0 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.”
Business
- Website
- https://www.evolvepeptides.comVerified1 Aug 2026sourceConfirmed reachable by the analysis run. Evidence: “Origin resolved and fetched: https://www.evolvepeptides.com”
- Legal entity
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Country
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Physical address
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Contact channels
- Email (support@evolvepeptides.com), Telephone 574-022-0073Published1 Aug 2026sourceContact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “support@evolvepeptides.com · 574-022-0073”
Commercial
- Pricing
- ungatedVerified1 Aug 2026sourcePrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…orous Third-Party Testing 200% Money-Back Guarantee Free Same-Day Shipping over $200! 13% OFF | Use Code FLASH | Ends in: Free shipping on orders over $200! [em…”
- Payment methods
- Zelle, PayPalPublished1 Aug 2026sourcePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…tore services to you. Listed below. Payments We accept payments through PayPal, Zelle, and our credit card processor via our eCommerce platform WooCommerce. Whe…”
- Guarantee / reship policy
- Case by caseVerified1 Aug 2026sourceA replacement is offered but the published policy reserves discretion to deny claims. Evidence: “…cts or product pricing are subject to change at any time without notice, at the sole discretion of us. We reserve the right to discontinue any product at any ti…”
Track record
- Independent reviews located
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Mean sentiment (0–5)
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Complaint pattern
- Not recordedNot recorded
Certificate recordsLot-level results with labeled versus assayed mass0 lotsView all →Hide ↑
Discrepancy is computed as the absolute difference between labeled and assayed mass, divided by the labeled mass. A vendor-published certificate is a claim; only an independently commissioned assay is treated as corroboration.
No certificate records are indexed. Either none are published, or those published could not be read without an account.
Compounds carried
- AOD-9604
- BPC-157
- CJC-1295
- DSIP
- Epithalon
- GHK-Cu
- Ipamorelin
- MOTS-c
- NAD+
- PT-141
- Retatrutide
- Selank
- Semax
- Sermorelin
- SS-31
- TB-500
- Tirzepatide
What the research says about what Evolve Peptides sells
BPC-157
What the research on BPC-157 actually shows
5 not established
CJC-1295
What the research on CJC-1295 actually shows
3 not established
DSIP
What the research on DSIP actually shows
3 not established
Epithalon
What the research on Epithalon actually shows
3 not established
GHK-Cu
What the research on GHK-Cu actually shows
3 not established
Ipamorelin
What the research on ipamorelin actually shows
4 not established
MOTS-c
What the research on MOTS-c actually shows
3 not established
NAD+
What the research on NAD+ actually shows
3 not established
PT-141
What the research on PT-141 actually shows
3 not established
Retatrutide
What the research on retatrutide actually shows
4 not established
Selank
What the research on Selank actually shows
3 not established
Semax
What the research on Semax actually shows
3 not established
Sermorelin
What the research on Sermorelin actually shows
3 not established
TB-500
What the research on TB-500 actually shows
4 not established
Tirzepatide
What the research on Tirzepatide actually shows
3 not established
A vendor’s score measures what it can demonstrate about its testing. It says nothing about whether the compounds it lists have evidence behind them — those are separate questions, and the digests above answer the second one.
How this score was calculatedEvery signal, its weight and the arithmetic — reconstructable by handrubric v1.10.0View calculation →Hide ↑
Each criterion is scored out of 100 over the signals we could assess, then weighted into the overall figure. Within a criterion, a signal contributes weight × merit × credit: merit is how good the recorded value is, credit is what its provenance earns — 1.00 for a value with a checkable source, 0 for a value recorded without one. A missing signal counts as a partial gap — half its weight — so a vendor that publishes what others leave blank scores higher, while a blank still costs; a value recorded without a source counts in full and earns nothing, so omitting one can never raise a score. A criterion with no data at all — track record when no independent reviews are locatable — is set aside and the remaining weights renormalised; the coverage figure, shown alongside, reports how complete the assessment is.
Testing transparency
46.4 / 100 · weight 26% → 12.1
Is the testing lab named? Is it ISO/IEC 17025 accredited? Are certificates of analysis lot-specific, and can anyone read them without an account?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing lab is namedNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 1 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 1 |
| Lab holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditationNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 4 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 4 |
| Certificate granularityCertificates cover a batch rather than an individual lot. | Per batchBatch-level certificates described by the vendor; no lot-specific certificate was reachable. Evidence: “…or research applications and ensure consistency, reliability, and purity. Every batch undergoes third-party testing with Certificates of Analysis available upon…” | Published1 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 1.80 / 3 |
| Certificates readable without an accountAnyone, including us, can read the certificates without registering. | PublicCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.” | Verified1 Aug 2026 | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 / 4 |
| Recognised testing laboratoryNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 6 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 6 |
| Testing transparency subtotal · coverage 39% | 5.80 / 18 | |||||
Documentation depth
76.9 / 100 · weight 22% → 16.9
Does the vendor publish labeled-versus-actual milligram figures, retain historical certificates, and how large are the discrepancies we can measure?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labeled vs. actual mg publishedNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 1 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 1 |
| Historical certificates retainedPast certificates remain accessible, so consistency over time can be checked. | RetainedSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “94 certificate documents reachable across 0 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.” | Verified1 Aug 2026 | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 / 3 |
| Certificates the vendor publishes94 certificates located; full credit at six. | 94 publishedCount of per-lot certificates the vendor publishes that the run located, readable or image scan. Evidence: “94 distinct certificate documents were reached and confirmed published during the run.” | Verified1 Aug 2026 | 7 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 / 7 |
| Labeled vs. actual discrepancyNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 1 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 1 |
| Certificate recencyNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 4 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 4 |
| Documentation depth subtotal · coverage 63% | 10.00 / 16 | |||||
Price & value
62.6 / 100 · weight 20% → 12.5
How the vendor’s per-milligram prices for a standard basket of common compounds compare to the market. Priced below the peer median scores higher; well above it scores lower. An overpriced vendor cannot outrank a comparably documented, better-priced one.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price vs market ($/mg)Priced about 2% above the peer median per milligram across a standard basket — weaker value than the typical vendor. | 102% of medianPrice index 102.4% of peer median across 14 compounds (0 outliers dropped): dsip $9/mg, semax $7.5/mg, ss-31 $3.4/mg, ghk-cu $1.3/mg, mots-c $6/mg, pt-141 $4.5/mg, selank $6/mg, tb-500 $9/mg. | Verified31 Aug 2026 · source | 10 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 6.26 / 10 |
| Price & value subtotal · coverage 100% | 6.26 / 10 | |||||
Track record
100 / 100 · weight 12% → 12
Adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges. Authority-issued and publicly verifiable. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored: for this market they can be manufactured.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory & enforcement recordNo adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. Authority actions — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — are recorded here when located; self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured. | None on record | Verified9 Sept 2026 | 10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.00 / 10 |
| Track record subtotal · coverage 100% | 10.00 / 10 | |||||
Business transparency
44.4 / 100 · weight 12% → 5.3
Is a legal entity named, is there a physical address, and can the vendor be reached?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Named legal entityNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 3 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 3 |
| Physical address publishedNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 2 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 2 |
| Contact channelsDistinct contact routes we could identify. Full credit at two. | Email (support@evolvepeptides.com), Telephone 574-022-0073Contact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “support@evolvepeptides.com · 574-022-0073” | Published1 Aug 2026 · source | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 / 2 |
| Business transparency subtotal · coverage 29% | 2.00 / 7 | |||||
Commercial clarity
83.3 / 100 · weight 8% → 6.7
Is pricing visible without an account, is there a stated guarantee or reship policy, and are payment methods disclosed?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing visible without an accountPrices are published openly and can be compared. | UngatedPrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…orous Third-Party Testing 200% Money-Back Guarantee Free Same-Day Shipping over $200! 13% OFF | Use Code FLASH | Ends in: Free shipping on orders over $200! [em…” | Verified1 Aug 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 / 4 |
| Guarantee / reship policyWhether the published policy states an outcome in advance or leaves it to discretion. | Case by caseA replacement is offered but the published policy reserves discretion to deny claims. Evidence: “…cts or product pricing are subject to change at any time without notice, at the sole discretion of us. We reserve the right to discontinue any product at any ti…” | Verified1 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.50 / 3 |
| Payment methods disclosedDisclosed payment routes. Full credit at three. | Zelle, PayPalPayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…tore services to you. Listed below. Payments We accept payments through PayPal, Zelle, and our credit card processor via our eCommerce platform WooCommerce. Whe…” | Published1 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.67 / 1 |
| Payment offers buyer recourseAccepts a payment method with buyer recourse — cards or wallets a processor underwrote, so a chargeback is possible if an order goes wrong. | Card / recoursePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…tore services to you. Listed below. Payments We accept payments through PayPal, Zelle, and our credit card processor via our eCommerce platform WooCommerce. Whe…” | Published1 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 / 3 |
| Commercial clarity subtotal · coverage 100% | 9.17 / 11 | |||||
Total
| Criterion | Subscore | Weight | Contribution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing transparency | 46.4 | 26% | 12.1 | 39% |
| Documentation depth | 76.9 | 22% | 16.9 | 63% |
| Price & value | 62.6 | 20% | 12.5 | 100% |
| Track record | 100 | 12% | 12 | 100% |
| Business transparency | 44.4 | 12% | 5.3 | 29% |
| Commercial clarity | 83.3 | 8% | 6.7 | 100% |
| Computed score | 100% | 65.5 | 67% |
Rubric v1.10.0 · 7 verified, 4 claimed, 0 unsourced, 8 not recorded, 0 stale of 19 scored signals
Community
Reviews
Reader reviews are community context only — they are never part of Evolve Peptides’s computed PepIndex score, which is built from evidence alone.
No reviews yet. .