Ascension Peptides
Re-analysis located 8 certificate record(s); 7 mapped to tracked compounds.
Edited by Slava Melikov, Research Editor · reviewed 5 Oct 2026
Last verified · 33 certificate records · rubric v1.11.0 · ascensionpeptides.com
Source: PepIndex, an independent index of research-peptide vendors. No vendor can pay for a rank, every score is computed by a published formula, and every figure links to the document it was read from.
Featured in the October 2026 peptide COA report →
PepIndex score
78.9 / 100
3.9/ 5Well documentedData coverage
89%
Coverage is the share of scored fields we hold and corroborated for Ascension Peptides. A score built on a handful of unchecked claims and a score built on forty verified data points are not the same finding, so both numbers are always published together. How coverage is computed.
Is Ascension Peptides legit?
Yes, on the evidence PepIndex holds. We have read 33 certificate records for Ascension Peptides, issued by 2 laboratories, and score it 78.9/100 on 89% data coverage — rank 13 of 57.
- Across those lots the mean assayed purity is 99.63%, and the weakest single lot came back at 98.44%.
- 17 of 33 lots assayed below the mass printed on the label.
- PepIndex holds no ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation record for those laboratories either way.
- Its certificates can be read without an account, so anyone can check these figures.
- On the business side it publishes a postal address and prices visible without an account.
What this does not tell you
- PepIndex has located no independent customer reviews for Ascension Peptides, so nothing here speaks to its service or fulfilment.
- A score measures what a vendor publishes about its testing and its business. It does not measure the contents of any vial a buyer actually receives, and PepIndex does not commission its own assays.
Certificate recordsLot-level results with labeled versus assayed mass33 lots9.5% mean deviationView all →Hide ↑
Discrepancy is computed as the absolute difference between labeled and assayed mass, divided by the labeled mass. A vendor-published certificate is a claim; only an independently commissioned assay is treated as corroboration.
Recorded data pointsEvery field with its source, capture date and whether we corroborated it9 verified8 claimed2 not recordedView all →Hide ↑
A tag of verified means we opened the cited source and confirmed the value; published means we recorded the vendor’s own published information, taken at face value. Both count in full; only a value with no checkable source earns nothing. Fields older than 30 days are marked stale.
Testing
- Testing laboratory
- Kovera LabsVerified5 Oct 2026sourceThe three most recent certificates (May 2026) are signed by Kovera Labs; the 32 earlier ones, July 2024 to April 2026, by MZ Biolabs. The crawl had recorded "DubAnalytics", which is the Dub link-tracking script on the vendor pages, not a laboratory.
- ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Certificate granularity
- Per lotVerified5 Oct 2026sourceLot-specific certificates observed directly. Evidence: “Certificates carry lot identifiers tied to individual product variants.”
- Certificate accessibility
- publicVerified5 Oct 2026editorial checkCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.”
- Labeled vs. actual mg published
- YesVerified5 Oct 2026sourceLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 10 mg, assayed 11.51 mg, purity 99.394% (lot 33-05260628, Kovera Labs).”
- Historical certificates retained
- YesVerified5 Oct 2026sourceSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “49 certificate documents reachable across 8 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.”
Business
- Website
- https://ascensionpeptides.comVerified5 Oct 2026sourceConfirmed reachable by the analysis run. Evidence: “Origin resolved and fetched: https://ascensionpeptides.com”
- Legal entity
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Country
- USVerified28 Sept 2026sourceEstablished by the postal address published on the vendor's own site: 1221 W. 103rd St Unit #212, Kansas City, MO 64114
- Physical address
- 1221 W. 103rd St Unit #212, Kansas City, MO 64114Published5 Oct 2026sourceContact page, read 2026-10-05: "1221 W. 103rd St Unit # 212 Kansas City, MO 64114".
- Contact channels
- Email (sales@ascensionpeptides.com), Telephone (303) 518-6550, Live chatPublished5 Oct 2026sourceContact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “sales@ascensionpeptides.com · (303) 518-6550”
Commercial
- Pricing
- ungatedVerified5 Oct 2026sourcePrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…nts are secure with our private security network. FREE SHIPPING for orders over $250 Customers who bought this item also bought SALE PE 22-28 10mg + Pinealon 10…”
- Payment methods
- Visa, MastercardPublished5 Oct 2026sourcePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…nquiries. Payment, Pricing & Promotions Ascension Peptides accept payments with Visa or Mastercard. We offer both individual pricing and wholesale bulk pricing.…”
- Guarantee / reship policy
- Case by caseVerified5 Oct 2026sourceA replacement is offered but the published policy reserves discretion to deny claims. Evidence: “…e information provided to check for accuracy. www.AscensionPeptides.com, at its sole discretion, may require further verification of affiliation prior to order…”
Track record
- Independent reviews located
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Mean sentiment (0–5)
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Complaint pattern
- Not recordedNot recorded
Compounds carried
What Ascension Peptides charges for each compound, read from its own store: the vial it lists, the price per milligram that implies, and that figure against the median of the vendors this index prices. Below 100% is cheaper than the market.
- Wolverine$4.50 /mg$90.00 for 20 mg70%Visit
- LL-37$8.90 /mg$89.00 for 10 mg74%Visit
- NAD+1 cert$0.10 /mg$104 for 1000 mg83%Visit
- DSIP1 cert$6.00 /mg$60.00 for 10 mg86%Visit
- BPC-1571 cert$4.90 /mg$49.00 for 10 mg89%Visit
- Thymosin Alpha-12 certs$7.10 /mg$71.00 for 10 mg93%Visit
- VIP1 cert$8.00 /mg$80.00 for 10 mg95%Visit
- GHK-Cu$0.59 /mg$59.00 for 100 mg98%Visit
- KPV1 cert$5.00 /mg$50.00 for 10 mg100%Visit
- Sermorelin1 cert$7.20 /mg$72.00 for 10 mg100%Visit
- AOD-96042 certs$11 /mg$55.00 for 5 mg105%Visit
- Pinealon$5.00 /mg$50.00 for 10 mg106%Visit
- GLOW$1.57 /mg$110 for 70 mg108%Visit
- PT-1411 cert$4.90 /mg$49.00 for 10 mg109%Visit
- CJC-12952 certs$10 /mg$50.00 for 5 mg111%Visit
- MOTS-c1 cert$6.20 /mg$62.00 for 10 mg113%Visit
- KLOW$1.50 /mg$120 for 80 mg115%Visit
- Selank1 cert$5.00 /mg$50.00 for 10 mg115%Visit
- Kisspeptin$6.00 /mg$60.00 for 10 mg115%Visit
- Melanotan I1 cert$5.00 /mg$50.00 for 10 mg119%Visit
- Epithalon1 cert$5.00 /mg$50.00 for 10 mg122%Visit
- Melanotan II$5.00 /mg$50.00 for 10 mg125%Visit
- Semax1 cert$5.00 /mg$50.00 for 10 mg125%Visit
- Tesamorelin1 cert$10 /mg$50.00 for 5 mg125%Visit
- ARA-2901 cert$7.00 /mg$70.00 for 10 mg127%Visit
- SS-311 cert$8.00 /mg$79.99 for 10 mg148%Visit
- 5-Amino-1MQ2 certs$5.20 /mg$52.00 for 10 mg158%Visit
- Ipamorelin3 certs$10 /mg$50.00 for 5 mg161%Visit
- TB-5001 cert$11 /mg$54.00 for 5 mg180%Visit
- Oxytocin$25 /mg$49.99 for 2 mg250%Visit
- Cagrilintide1 certNo price capturedVisit
- Retatrutide2 certsNo price capturedVisit
- Semaglutide1 certNo price capturedVisit
- Tirzepatide2 certsNo price capturedVisit
Score history
| First recorded | 79.2 · #172 Oct 2026 |
|---|---|
| Best rank | #1323 Oct 2026 |
| Today | 78.9 · #13-0.3 since first recorded |
Strengths
- Publishes 40 certificates on its own site; 33 read and recorded here
- Certificates are readable publicly, without an account
- Testing laboratory named on certificates (Kovera Labs)
- Publishes a physical postal address
- Prices are visible without an account
Weaknesses
- No ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation recorded for the testing lab
- No registered legal entity is disclosed
- No independent third-party reviews located
What the certificates test
Beyond purity and mass. Each row is an assay the laboratory ran and the verdict its own certificate printed. Coverage is recorded, not figures: these documents are tables, and the specification and the result are not reliably separable once the text is extracted.
- Identity (mass spectrometry)
- ReportedLC-MSon 28 of 28
- Purity (HPLC)
- ReportedHPLC, HPLC-UVon 28 of 28
- Content / quantitation
- ReportedHPLC-UVon 24 of 28
Not reported on the certificates read: Bacterial endotoxins, Sterility, Elemental impurities / heavy metals, Residual solvents, Microbial / bioburden. A test a certificate does not mention is a test this index holds nothing on — it is not a failure and is not counted as one.
Read 5 Oct 2026 from the certificates themselves. How evidence is recorded.
Third-party reviews
Shown for reference and kept out of the score. Review platforms can be gamed — ratings bought, competitors brigaded, profiles removed — so nothing here is treated as evidence of what is in a vial. The score is computed from certificates and documentation alone.
- Trustpilot
- Profile removed by TrustpilotThis profile has been removed. The business you’re trying to find goes against our guidelines and is no longer visible on Trustpilot.read 1 Oct 2026
- Finnrick
- Listed, no lab testsread 1 Oct 2026
Regulatory & enforcement record
No adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. We record authority actions — FDA warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — when located. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured.
How this score was calculatedEvery signal, its weight and the arithmetic — reconstructable by handrubric v1.11.0View calculation →Hide ↑
Each criterion is scored out of 100 over the signals we could assess, then weighted into the overall figure. Within a criterion, a signal contributes weight × merit × credit: merit is how good the recorded value is, credit is what its provenance earns — 1.00 for a value with a checkable source, 0 for a value recorded without one. A missing signal counts as a partial gap — half its weight — so a vendor that publishes what others leave blank scores higher, while a blank still costs; a value recorded without a source counts in full and earns nothing, so omitting one can never raise a score. A criterion with no data at all — track record when no independent reviews are locatable — is set aside and the remaining weights renormalised; the coverage figure, shown alongside, reports how complete the assessment is.
Testing transparency
83.8 / 100 · weight 26% → 21.8
Is the testing lab named? Is it ISO/IEC 17025 accredited? Are certificates of analysis lot-specific, and can anyone read them without an account?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing lab is namedA specific laboratory is identified, so the assay can be traced. | Kovera LabsThe three most recent certificates (May 2026) are signed by Kovera Labs; the 32 earlier ones, July 2024 to April 2026, by MZ Biolabs. The crawl had recorded "DubAnalytics", which is the Dub link-tracking script on the vendor pages, not a laboratory. | Verified5 Oct 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 / 1 |
| Lab holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditationNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 4 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 4 |
| Certificate granularityCertificates are lot-specific, so a certificate maps to the vial received. | Per lotLot-specific certificates observed directly. Evidence: “Certificates carry lot identifiers tied to individual product variants.” | Verified5 Oct 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 / 3 |
| Certificates readable without an accountAnyone, including us, can read the certificates without registering. | PublicCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.” | Verified5 Oct 2026 | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 / 4 |
| Recognised testing laboratory33 of 33 certificates name a real, identifiable testing laboratory (a known lab, or a clearly independent one). Certificates with no named lab, or where the "lab" is just the vendor's own name, do not count — anyone can print those. | 33 / 33 recognised lab | PublishedStale23 May 2026 · source | 6 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 5.40 / 6 |
| Testing transparency subtotal · coverage 78% | 13.40 / 18 | |||||
Documentation depth
87.1 / 100 · weight 22% → 19.2
Does the vendor publish labeled-versus-actual milligram figures, retain historical certificates, and how large are the discrepancies we can measure?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labeled vs. actual mg publishedQuantitative fill data is published, not only a purity percentage. | PublishedLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 10 mg, assayed 11.51 mg, purity 99.394% (lot 33-05260628, Kovera Labs).” | Verified5 Oct 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 / 1 |
| Historical certificates retainedPast certificates remain accessible, so consistency over time can be checked. | RetainedSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “49 certificate documents reachable across 8 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.” | Verified5 Oct 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 / 3 |
| Certificates the vendor publishes40 certificates located, 33 of them indexed with readable results; full credit at six. | 40 published, 33 indexed | PublishedStale23 May 2026 · source | 7 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 6.30 / 7 |
| Labeled vs. actual discrepancyMean absolute deviation between labeled and assayed mass across 33 certificates. Zero scores full marks; 10% or worse scores nothing. | 9.5% mean | PublishedStale23 May 2026 · source | 1 | 0.05 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.04 / 1 |
| Certificate recencyThe most recent certificate is dated 2026-05-23, about 5 months ago. Certificates within a year score full marks; two years or older scores nothing. | newest 2026-05-23 | PublishedStale23 May 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 3.60 / 4 |
| Documentation depth subtotal · coverage 100% | 13.94 / 16 | |||||
Price & value
52.3 / 100 · weight 20% → 10.5
How the vendor’s per-milligram prices for a standard basket of common compounds compare to the market. Priced below the peer median scores higher; well above it scores lower. An overpriced vendor cannot outrank a comparably documented, better-priced one.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price vs market ($/mg)Priced about 13% above the peer median per milligram across a standard basket — weaker value than the typical vendor. | 113% of medianPrice index 112.7% of peer median across 25 compounds (1 outlier dropped): kpv $5/mg, vip $8/mg, dsip $6/mg, ll-37 $8.9/mg, semax $5/mg, ss-31 $8/mg, ghk-cu $0.59/mg, mots-c $6.2/mg. | Verified6 Oct 2026 · source | 10 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 5.23 / 10 |
| Price & value subtotal · coverage 100% | 5.23 / 10 | |||||
Track record
100 / 100 · weight 12% → 12
Adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges. Authority-issued and publicly verifiable. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored: for this market they can be manufactured.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory & enforcement recordNo adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. Authority actions — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — are recorded here when located; self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured. | None on record | Verified24 Oct 2026 | 10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.00 / 10 |
| Track record subtotal · coverage 100% | 10.00 / 10 | |||||
Business transparency
72.7 / 100 · weight 12% → 8.7
Is a legal entity named, is there a physical address, and can the vendor be reached?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Named legal entityNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 3 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 3 |
| Physical address publishedA postal address is published. | 1221 W. 103rd St Unit #212, Kansas City, MO 64114Contact page, read 2026-10-05: "1221 W. 103rd St Unit # 212 Kansas City, MO 64114". | Published5 Oct 2026 · source | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 / 2 |
| Contact channelsDistinct contact routes we could identify. Full credit at two. | Email (sales@ascensionpeptides.com), Telephone (303) 518-6550, Live chatContact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “sales@ascensionpeptides.com · (303) 518-6550” | Published5 Oct 2026 · source | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 / 2 |
| Business transparency subtotal · coverage 57% | 4.00 / 7 | |||||
Commercial clarity
83.3 / 100 · weight 8% → 6.7
Is pricing visible without an account, is there a stated guarantee or reship policy, and are payment methods disclosed?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing visible without an accountPrices are published openly and can be compared. | UngatedPrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…nts are secure with our private security network. FREE SHIPPING for orders over $250 Customers who bought this item also bought SALE PE 22-28 10mg + Pinealon 10…” | Verified5 Oct 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 / 4 |
| Guarantee / reship policyWhether the published policy states an outcome in advance or leaves it to discretion. | Case by caseA replacement is offered but the published policy reserves discretion to deny claims. Evidence: “…e information provided to check for accuracy. www.AscensionPeptides.com, at its sole discretion, may require further verification of affiliation prior to order…” | Verified5 Oct 2026 · source | 3 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.50 / 3 |
| Payment methods disclosedDisclosed payment routes. Full credit at three. | Visa, MastercardPayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…nquiries. Payment, Pricing & Promotions Ascension Peptides accept payments with Visa or Mastercard. We offer both individual pricing and wholesale bulk pricing.…” | Published5 Oct 2026 · source | 1 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.67 / 1 |
| Payment offers buyer recourseAccepts a payment method with buyer recourse — cards or wallets a processor underwrote, so a chargeback is possible if an order goes wrong. | Card / recoursePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…nquiries. Payment, Pricing & Promotions Ascension Peptides accept payments with Visa or Mastercard. We offer both individual pricing and wholesale bulk pricing.…” | Published5 Oct 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 / 3 |
| Commercial clarity subtotal · coverage 100% | 9.17 / 11 | |||||
Total
| Criterion | Subscore | Weight | Contribution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing transparency | 83.8 | 26% | 21.8 | 78% |
| Documentation depth | 87.1 | 22% | 19.2 | 100% |
| Price & value | 52.3 | 20% | 10.5 | 100% |
| Track record | 100 | 12% | 12 | 100% |
| Business transparency | 72.7 | 12% | 8.7 | 57% |
| Commercial clarity | 83.3 | 8% | 6.7 | 100% |
| Computed score | 100% | 78.9 | 89% |
Rubric v1.11.0 · 9 verified, 8 claimed, 0 unsourced, 2 not recorded, 4 stale of 19 scored signals
Community
Reviews
Reader reviews are community context only — they are never part of Ascension Peptides’s computed PepIndex score, which is built from evidence alone.
No reviews yet. .