
Modern Aminos
Re-analysis of the published site located 64 certificate records and wrote 30 mapped to tracked compounds. 6 strengths and 2 weaknesses recorded from the findings.
Edited by Slava Melikov, Research Editor · reviewed 28 Sept 2026
Last verified · 30 certificate records · rubric v1.11.0 · modernaminos.com
Source: PepIndex, an independent index of research-peptide vendors. No vendor can pay for a rank, every score is computed by a published formula, and every figure links to the document it was read from.
Featured in the October 2026 peptide COA report →
PepIndex score
81.1 / 100
4.1/ 5Well documentedData coverage
97%
Coverage is the share of scored fields we hold and corroborated for Modern Aminos. A score built on a handful of unchecked claims and a score built on forty verified data points are not the same finding, so both numbers are always published together. How coverage is computed.
Is Modern Aminos legit?
Yes, on the evidence PepIndex holds. We have read 30 certificate records for Modern Aminos, issued by 2 laboratories, and score it 81.1/100 on 97% data coverage — rank 9 of 57.
- Across those lots the mean assayed purity is 99.65%, and the weakest single lot came back at 99.06%.
- 9 of 30 lots assayed below the mass printed on the label.
- PepIndex records those laboratories as holding ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation.
- Its certificates are account required, which limits independent checking.
- On the business side it publishes a named legal entity, a postal address and prices visible without an account.
What this does not tell you
- PepIndex has located no independent customer reviews for Modern Aminos, so nothing here speaks to its service or fulfilment.
- Because its certificates are not openly readable, a buyer cannot verify a specific lot without the vendor's cooperation.
- A score measures what a vendor publishes about its testing and its business. It does not measure the contents of any vial a buyer actually receives, and PepIndex does not commission its own assays.
Certificate recordsLot-level results with labeled versus assayed mass30 lots12.3% mean deviationView all →Hide ↑
Discrepancy is computed as the absolute difference between labeled and assayed mass, divided by the labeled mass. A vendor-published certificate is a claim; only an independently commissioned assay is treated as corroboration.
Recorded data pointsEvery field with its source, capture date and whether we corroborated it10 verified9 claimed0 not recordedView all →Hide ↑
A tag of verified means we opened the cited source and confirmed the value; published means we recorded the vendor’s own published information, taken at face value. Both count in full; only a value with no checkable source earns nothing. Fields older than 30 days are marked stale.
Testing
- Testing laboratory
- Vanguard LaboratoryVerifiedStale1 Aug 2026sourceLaboratory read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “Laboratory named on the certificate document: Vanguard Laboratory.”
- ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation
- YesVerifiedStale1 Aug 2026sourceAccreditation read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation stated on the certificate document.”
- Certificate granularity
- Per lotVerifiedStale1 Aug 2026sourceLot-specific certificates observed directly. Evidence: “Certificates carry lot identifiers tied to individual product variants.”
- Certificate accessibility
- Account requiredVerifiedStale1 Aug 2026editorial checkContent sits behind what appears to be an account wall. The tool does not create accounts or use credentials, so this is recorded as unreachable. Evidence: “Content sits behind what appears to be an account wall. The tool does not create accounts or use credentials, so this is recorded as unreachable.”
- Labeled vs. actual mg published
- YesVerifiedStale1 Aug 2026sourceLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 20 mg, assayed 18.07 mg, purity 99.09% (lot BX-P-J9A0, Freedom Diagnostics Testing).”
- Historical certificates retained
- YesVerifiedStale1 Aug 2026sourceSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “154 certificate documents reachable across 64 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.”
Business
- Website
- https://modernaminos.comVerifiedStale1 Aug 2026sourceConfirmed reachable by the analysis run. Evidence: “Origin resolved and fetched: https://modernaminos.com”
- Legal entity
- M.A. LLCPublishedStale1 Aug 2026sourceEntity name as published by the vendor. Not checked against a corporate registry. Evidence: “…e is approved by our team, items must be shipped to our processing facility at: M.A. LLC 9169 W State St #1451 Garden City, ID 83714 US Lost Shipments & Missing…”
- Country
- USVerified28 Sept 2026editorial checkRead from the postal address this vendor publishes (9169 W State St #1451 Garden City, ID 83714 US). A published address is not proof of an operating location — several vendors in this index use a registered-agent suite — so this records where the vendor says it is, not where it necessarily ships from.
- Physical address
- 9169 W State St #1451 Garden City, ID 83714 USPublishedStale1 Aug 2026sourcePublished by the vendor. Confirmed present on the page; not independently confirmed as an operating location. Evidence: “…oved by our team, items must be shipped to our processing facility at: M.A. LLC 9169 W State St #1451 Garden City, ID 83714 US Lost Shipments & Missing Items If…”
- Contact channels
- Email (cs@modernaminos.com)PublishedStale1 Aug 2026sourceContact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “cs@modernaminos.com”
Commercial
- Pricing
- ungatedVerifiedStale1 Aug 2026sourcePrices are readable without an account. The storefront itself sits behind an attestation gate, but prices were reachable outside it. Evidence: “…of Service 0 Your Cart is Empty Fill your cart with amazing items Shop Now Add $ 200.00 more to get free shipping! Select options”
- Payment methods
- Visa, Mastercard, Discover, BitcoinPublishedStale1 Aug 2026sourcePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…tion, and Chargebacks We accept the following payment methods: US credit cards (Visa, Mastercard, AMEX), Same-Day Bank Payment, and Bitcoin (via BTCPay). All tr…”
- Guarantee / reship policy
- Guaranteed reshipVerifiedStale1 Aug 2026sourceThe published policy states an outcome in advance. Evidence: “…not recovered, and the delivery confirmation report shows a non-delivery, then we will reship the order at no cost to you. However, if a shipment is claimed to…”
Track record
- Independent reviews located
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Mean sentiment (0–5)
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Complaint pattern
- Not recordedNot recorded
Compounds carried
What Modern Aminos charges for each compound, read from its own store: the vial it lists, the price per milligram that implies, and that figure against the median of the vendors this index prices. Below 100% is cheaper than the market.
- 5-Amino-1MQ4 certs$1.98 /mg$99.00 for 50 mg60%Visit
- Pinealon$3.05 /mg$61.00 for 20 mg65%Visit
- Epithalon$2.80 /mg$28.00 for 10 mg68%Visit
- AOD-96041 cert$7.80 /mg$39.00 for 5 mg74%Visit
- Oxytocin$5.80 /mg$29.00 for 5 mg75%Visit
- MOTS-c2 certs$4.20 /mg$42.00 for 10 mg76%Visit
- LL-371 cert$9.40 /mg$47.00 for 5 mg78%Visit
- IGF-1 LR31 cert$64 /mg$64.00 for 1 mg85%Visit
- Tesamorelin2 certs$7.10 /mg$71.00 for 10 mg89%Visit
- Vilon$2.70 /mg$54.00 for 20 mg90%Visit
- PT-141$4.10 /mg$41.00 for 10 mg91%Visit
- KPV1 cert$4.60 /mg$46.00 for 10 mg92%Visit
- Kisspeptin1 cert$4.90 /mg$49.00 for 10 mg94%Visit
- Melanotan II$3.80 /mg$38.00 for 10 mg95%Visit
- TB-500$5.90 /mg$59.00 for 10 mg98%Visit
- Wolverine$6.40 /mg$128 for 20 mg100%Visit
- ATX-304$1.39 /mg$139 for 100 mg100%Visit
- Cagrilintide$9.90 /mg$99.00 for 10 mg100%Visit
- DSIP1 cert$7.00 /mg$35.00 for 5 mg100%Visit
- HGH Fragment 176-191$8.80 /mg$44.00 for 5 mg100%Visit
- L-Carnitine$0.09 /mg$51.00 for 600 mg100%Visit
- Mazdutide$16 /mg$78.00 for 5 mg100%Visit
- Methylene Blue$6.80 /mg$34.00 for 5 mg100%Visit
- NAD+$0.12 /mg$58.00 for 500 mg100%Visit
- PE-22-28$5.40 /mg$54.00 for 10 mg100%Visit
- Tesofensine$278 /mg$139 for 0.5 mg100%Visit
- Sermorelin$7.40 /mg$74.00 for 10 mg103%Visit
- Ipamorelin2 certs$6.40 /mg$64.00 for 10 mg103%Visit
- Selank1 cert$4.50 /mg$45.00 for 10 mg103%Visit
- Semax2 certs$4.20 /mg$42.00 for 10 mg105%Visit
- Thymosin Alpha-12 certs$8.00 /mg$80.00 for 10 mg105%Visit
- GHK-Cu2 certs$0.64 /mg$64.00 for 100 mg107%Visit
- CJC-12952 certs$10 /mg$52.00 for 5 mg116%Visit
- Hexarelin1 cert$14 /mg$68.00 for 5 mg116%Visit
- BPC-1572 certs$6.80 /mg$68.00 for 10 mg124%Visit
- Glutathione1 cert$0.09 /mg$54.00 for 600 mg180%Visit
- ARA-2901 cert$10 /mg$51.00 for 5 mg186%Visit
- Dihexa$19 /mg$94.00 for 5 mg250%Visit
- SLU-PP-332$298 /mg$149 for 0.5 mg250%Visit
Score history
| First recorded | 87.4 · #72 Oct 2026 |
|---|---|
| Best rank | #72 Oct 2026 |
| Today | 81.1 · #9-6.3 since first recorded |
Strengths
- Publishes 154 certificates on its own site; 30 read and recorded here
- Testing laboratory named on certificates (Vanguard Laboratory)
- Testing laboratory holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation
- Operates under a named legal entity (M.A. LLC)
- Publishes a physical postal address
- Prices are visible without an account
Weaknesses
- Certificates are gated rather than openly readable
- No independent third-party reviews located
What the certificates test
Beyond purity and mass. Each row is an assay the laboratory ran and the verdict its own certificate printed. Coverage is recorded, not figures: these documents are tables, and the specification and the result are not reliably separable once the text is extracted.
- Bacterial endotoxins
- ReportedUSP <85>on 27 of 29
- Identity (mass spectrometry)
- ReportedLC-MSon 27 of 29
- Purity (HPLC)
- ReportedHPLC-UV, RP-HPLC, HPLC, HPLC-UV/VISon 29 of 29
- Content / quantitation
- Reportedon 29 of 29
- Appearance
- Reportedon 26 of 29
- Sterility
- PassUSP <71>on 1 of 29
- Elemental impurities / heavy metals
- Passon 1 of 29
Safety assays on record: Bacterial endotoxins, Sterility, Elemental impurities / heavy metals.
Not reported on the certificates read: Residual solvents, Microbial / bioburden. A test a certificate does not mention is a test this index holds nothing on — it is not a failure and is not counted as one.
Read 5 Oct 2026 from the certificates themselves. How evidence is recorded.
Third-party reviews
Shown for reference and kept out of the score. Review platforms can be gamed — ratings bought, competitors brigaded, profiles removed — so nothing here is treated as evidence of what is in a vial. The score is computed from certificates and documentation alone.
- Trustpilot
- Profile removed by TrustpilotThis profile has been removed. The business you’re trying to find goes against our guidelines and is no longer visible on Trustpilot.read 1 Oct 2026
- Finnrick
- 80% pass rate across 5 lab tests (4 pass, 1 fail)All five tests on Retatrutide.read 1 Oct 2026 · Finnrick’s own lab tests on samples it obtained, reported as stated; not reproduced here
Regulatory & enforcement record
No adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. We record authority actions — FDA warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — when located. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured.
How this score was calculatedEvery signal, its weight and the arithmetic — reconstructable by handrubric v1.11.0View calculation →Hide ↑
Each criterion is scored out of 100 over the signals we could assess, then weighted into the overall figure. Within a criterion, a signal contributes weight × merit × credit: merit is how good the recorded value is, credit is what its provenance earns — 1.00 for a value with a checkable source, 0 for a value recorded without one. A missing signal counts as a partial gap — half its weight — so a vendor that publishes what others leave blank scores higher, while a blank still costs; a value recorded without a source counts in full and earns nothing, so omitting one can never raise a score. A criterion with no data at all — track record when no independent reviews are locatable — is set aside and the remaining weights renormalised; the coverage figure, shown alongside, reports how complete the assessment is.
Testing transparency
80 / 100 · weight 26% → 20.8
Is the testing lab named? Is it ISO/IEC 17025 accredited? Are certificates of analysis lot-specific, and can anyone read them without an account?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing lab is namedA specific laboratory is identified, so the assay can be traced. | Vanguard LaboratoryLaboratory read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “Laboratory named on the certificate document: Vanguard Laboratory.” | VerifiedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.90 / 1 |
| Lab holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditationAccredited to ISO/IEC 17025 for the relevant test scope. | ISO/IEC 17025Accreditation read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation stated on the certificate document.” | VerifiedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 3.60 / 4 |
| Certificate granularityCertificates are lot-specific, so a certificate maps to the vial received. | Per lotLot-specific certificates observed directly. Evidence: “Certificates carry lot identifiers tied to individual product variants.” | VerifiedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 2.70 / 3 |
| Certificates readable without an accountCertificates are gated, which limits independent checking. | Account requiredContent sits behind what appears to be an account wall. The tool does not create accounts or use credentials, so this is recorded as unreachable. Evidence: “Content sits behind what appears to be an account wall. The tool does not create accounts or use credentials, so this is recorded as unreachable.” | VerifiedStale1 Aug 2026 | 4 | 0.50 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 1.80 / 4 |
| Recognised testing laboratory30 of 30 certificates name a real, identifiable testing laboratory (a known lab, or a clearly independent one). Certificates with no named lab, or where the "lab" is just the vendor's own name, do not count — anyone can print those. | 30 / 30 recognised lab | PublishedStale21 Jul 2026 · source | 6 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 5.40 / 6 |
| Testing transparency subtotal · coverage 93% | 14.40 / 18 | |||||
Documentation depth
84.4 / 100 · weight 22% → 18.6
Does the vendor publish labeled-versus-actual milligram figures, retain historical certificates, and how large are the discrepancies we can measure?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labeled vs. actual mg publishedQuantitative fill data is published, not only a purity percentage. | PublishedLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 20 mg, assayed 18.07 mg, purity 99.09% (lot BX-P-J9A0, Freedom Diagnostics Testing).” | VerifiedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.90 / 1 |
| Historical certificates retainedPast certificates remain accessible, so consistency over time can be checked. | RetainedSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “154 certificate documents reachable across 64 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.” | VerifiedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 2.70 / 3 |
| Certificates the vendor publishes154 certificates located, 30 of them indexed with readable results; full credit at six. | 154 published, 30 indexed | PublishedStale21 Jul 2026 · source | 7 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 6.30 / 7 |
| Labeled vs. actual discrepancyMean absolute deviation between labeled and assayed mass across 30 certificates. Zero scores full marks; 10% or worse scores nothing. | 12.3% mean | PublishedStale21 Jul 2026 · source | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.00 / 1 |
| Certificate recencyThe most recent certificate is dated 2026-07-21, about 3 months ago. Certificates within a year score full marks; two years or older scores nothing. | newest 2026-07-21 | PublishedStale21 Jul 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 3.60 / 4 |
| Documentation depth subtotal · coverage 98% | 13.50 / 16 | |||||
Price & value
65.8 / 100 · weight 20% → 13.2
How the vendor’s per-milligram prices for a standard basket of common compounds compare to the market. Priced below the peer median scores higher; well above it scores lower. An overpriced vendor cannot outrank a comparably documented, better-priced one.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price vs market ($/mg)Priced about 1% below the peer median per milligram across a standard basket — better value than the typical vendor. | 99% of medianPrice index 99.2% of peer median across 28 compounds (2 outliers dropped): kpv $4.6/mg, dsip $7/mg, ll-37 $9.4/mg, semax $4.2/mg, vilon $2.7/mg, ghk-cu $0.64/mg, mots-c $4.2/mg, pt-141 $4.1/mg. | Verified6 Oct 2026 · source | 10 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 6.58 / 10 |
| Price & value subtotal · coverage 100% | 6.58 / 10 | |||||
Track record
100 / 100 · weight 12% → 12
Adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges. Authority-issued and publicly verifiable. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored: for this market they can be manufactured.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory & enforcement recordNo adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. Authority actions — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — are recorded here when located; self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured. | None on record | Verified24 Oct 2026 | 10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.00 / 10 |
| Track record subtotal · coverage 100% | 10.00 / 10 | |||||
Business transparency
77.1 / 100 · weight 12% → 9.3
Is a legal entity named, is there a physical address, and can the vendor be reached?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Named legal entityA registered entity is named, so there is someone to hold responsible. | M.A. LLCEntity name as published by the vendor. Not checked against a corporate registry. Evidence: “…e is approved by our team, items must be shipped to our processing facility at: M.A. LLC 9169 W State St #1451 Garden City, ID 83714 US Lost Shipments & Missing…” | PublishedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 2.70 / 3 |
| Physical address publishedA postal address is published. | 9169 W State St #1451 Garden City, ID 83714 USPublished by the vendor. Confirmed present on the page; not independently confirmed as an operating location. Evidence: “…oved by our team, items must be shipped to our processing facility at: M.A. LLC 9169 W State St #1451 Garden City, ID 83714 US Lost Shipments & Missing Items If…” | PublishedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 1.80 / 2 |
| Contact channelsDistinct contact routes we could identify. Full credit at two. | Email (cs@modernaminos.com)Contact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “cs@modernaminos.com” | PublishedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 2 | 0.50 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.90 / 2 |
| Business transparency subtotal · coverage 100% | 5.40 / 7 | |||||
Commercial clarity
90 / 100 · weight 8% → 7.2
Is pricing visible without an account, is there a stated guarantee or reship policy, and are payment methods disclosed?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing visible without an accountPrices are published openly and can be compared. | UngatedPrices are readable without an account. The storefront itself sits behind an attestation gate, but prices were reachable outside it. Evidence: “…of Service 0 Your Cart is Empty Fill your cart with amazing items Shop Now Add $ 200.00 more to get free shipping! Select options” | VerifiedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 3.60 / 4 |
| Guarantee / reship policyWhether the published policy states an outcome in advance or leaves it to discretion. | Stated guaranteeThe published policy states an outcome in advance. Evidence: “…not recovered, and the delivery confirmation report shows a non-delivery, then we will reship the order at no cost to you. However, if a shipment is claimed to…” | VerifiedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 2.70 / 3 |
| Payment methods disclosedDisclosed payment routes. Full credit at three. | Visa, Mastercard, Discover, BitcoinPayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…tion, and Chargebacks We accept the following payment methods: US credit cards (Visa, Mastercard, AMEX), Same-Day Bank Payment, and Bitcoin (via BTCPay). All tr…” | PublishedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.90 / 1 |
| Payment offers buyer recourseAccepts a payment method with buyer recourse — cards or wallets a processor underwrote, so a chargeback is possible if an order goes wrong. | Card / recoursePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…tion, and Chargebacks We accept the following payment methods: US credit cards (Visa, Mastercard, AMEX), Same-Day Bank Payment, and Bitcoin (via BTCPay). All tr…” | PublishedStale1 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 2.70 / 3 |
| Commercial clarity subtotal · coverage 94% | 9.90 / 11 | |||||
Total
| Criterion | Subscore | Weight | Contribution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing transparency | 80 | 26% | 20.8 | 93% |
| Documentation depth | 84.4 | 22% | 18.6 | 98% |
| Price & value | 65.8 | 20% | 13.2 | 100% |
| Track record | 100 | 12% | 12 | 100% |
| Business transparency | 77.1 | 12% | 9.3 | 100% |
| Commercial clarity | 90 | 8% | 7.2 | 94% |
| Computed score | 100% | 81.1 | 97% |
Rubric v1.11.0 · 10 verified, 9 claimed, 0 unsourced, 0 not recorded, 17 stale of 19 scored signals
Community
Reviews
Reader reviews are community context only — they are never part of Modern Aminos’s computed PepIndex score, which is built from evidence alone.
No reviews yet. .