Licensed Peptides
Re-analysis of the published site located 31 certificate records and wrote 23 mapped to tracked compounds. 6 strengths and 2 weaknesses recorded from the findings.
Edited by Slava Melikov, Research Editor · reviewed 28 Sept 2026
Last verified · 15 certificate records · rubric v1.11.0 · licensedpeptides.com
Source: PepIndex, an independent index of research-peptide vendors. No vendor can pay for a rank, every score is computed by a published formula, and every figure links to the document it was read from.
PepIndex score
61.4 / 100
3.1/ 5Partly documentedData coverage
87%
Coverage is the share of scored fields we hold and corroborated for Licensed Peptides. A score built on a handful of unchecked claims and a score built on forty verified data points are not the same finding, so both numbers are always published together. How coverage is computed.
Is Licensed Peptides legit?
Yes, on the evidence PepIndex holds. We have read 15 certificate records for Licensed Peptides, issued by 2 laboratories, and score it 61.4/100 on 87% data coverage — rank 26 of 57.
- Across those lots the mean assayed purity is 99.46%, and the weakest single lot came back at 98.36%.
- 3 of 15 lots assayed below the mass printed on the label.
- PepIndex holds no ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation record for those laboratories either way.
- Its certificates can be read without an account, so anyone can check these figures.
- On the business side it publishes a postal address and prices visible without an account.
What this does not tell you
- PepIndex has located no independent customer reviews for Licensed Peptides, so nothing here speaks to its service or fulfilment.
- A score measures what a vendor publishes about its testing and its business. It does not measure the contents of any vial a buyer actually receives, and PepIndex does not commission its own assays.
Certificate recordsLot-level results with labeled versus assayed mass15 lots9.3% mean deviationView all →Hide ↑
Discrepancy is computed as the absolute difference between labeled and assayed mass, divided by the labeled mass. A vendor-published certificate is a claim; only an independently commissioned assay is treated as corroboration.
Recorded data pointsEvery field with its source, capture date and whether we corroborated it8 verified9 claimed2 not recordedView all →Hide ↑
A tag of verified means we opened the cited source and confirmed the value; published means we recorded the vendor’s own published information, taken at face value. Both count in full; only a value with no checkable source earns nothing. Fields older than 30 days are marked stale.
Testing
- Testing laboratory
- Vanguard LaboratoryVerifiedStale3 Aug 2026sourceLaboratory read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “Laboratory named on the certificate document: Vanguard Laboratory.”
- ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Certificate granularity
- Per batchPublishedStale3 Aug 2026sourceBatch-level certificates described by the vendor; no lot-specific certificate was reachable. Evidence: “…10 bottles) 250 mcg. Independently tested, endotoxin screened, and supported by batch-specific Certificates of Analysis. BPC-157 Capsules 250mcg (10 Bottles) Wh…”
- Certificate accessibility
- publicVerifiedStale3 Aug 2026editorial checkCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.”
- Labeled vs. actual mg published
- YesVerifiedStale3 Aug 2026sourceLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 60 mg, assayed 57.87 mg, purity 99.8% (lot LP02202016, Vanguard Laboratory).”
- Historical certificates retained
- YesVerifiedStale3 Aug 2026editorial checkSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “74 certificate documents reachable across 21 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.”
Business
- Website
- https://licensedpeptides.comVerifiedStale3 Aug 2026sourceConfirmed reachable by the analysis run. Evidence: “Origin resolved and fetched: https://licensedpeptides.com”
- Legal entity
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Country
- USVerified28 Sept 2026editorial checkRead from the postal address this vendor publishes (1489 W Palmetto Park Rd Boca Raton, FL 33486). A published address is not proof of an operating location — several vendors in this index use a registered-agent suite — so this records where the vendor says it is, not where it necessarily ships from.
- Physical address
- 1489 W Palmetto Park Rd Boca Raton, FL 33486PublishedStale3 Aug 2026sourcePublished by the vendor. Confirmed present on the page; not independently confirmed as an operating location. Evidence: “…214 Mon-Fri 8:30AM-6:30PM EST [email protected] Typically replies same day 1489 W Palmetto Park Rd Boca Raton, FL 33486 © 2026 LicensedPeptides.com. All Ri…”
- Contact channels
- Telephone (855) 322-2214PublishedStale3 Aug 2026sourceContact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “(855) 322-2214”
Commercial
- Pricing
- ungatedVerifiedStale3 Aug 2026sourcePrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…O/IEC 17025:2017 GMP-Certified USA-manufactured Same-Day Shipping Free FedEx on $200+ 99%+ Purity Guaranteed per batch HPLC + Mass Spec Independent lab verified…”
- Payment methods
- Bank transferPublishedStale3 Aug 2026sourcePayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…overnment, and educational institutions Multiple payment options: credit/debit, bank transfer, and alternative methods Why Choose Licensed Peptides? At Licensed…”
- Guarantee / reship policy
- Guaranteed reshipVerifiedStale3 Aug 2026sourceThe published policy states an outcome in advance. Evidence: “…due to carrier issues, weather, customs, or other unforeseen factors We do not guarantee delivery dates 5. Order Tracking Once your order has shipped, you will…”
Track record
- Independent reviews located
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Mean sentiment (0–5)
- Not recordedNot recorded
- Complaint pattern
- Not recordedNot recorded
Compounds carried
What Licensed Peptides charges for each compound, read from its own store: the vial it lists, the price per milligram that implies, and that figure against the median of the vendors this index prices. Below 100% is cheaper than the market.
- 5-Amino-1MQ1 cert$1.80 /mg$89.99 for 50 mg55%Visit
- Semax$2.57 /mg$76.99 for 30 mg64%Visit
- CJC-12951 cert$7.80 /mg$38.99 for 5 mg87%Visit
- AHK-Cu$0.67 /mg$66.99 for 100 mg96%Visit
- Oxytocin$7.70 /mg$76.99 for 10 mg100%Visit
- ARA-290$5.94 /mg$94.99 for 16 mg108%Visit
- Wolverine$7.00 /mg$140 for 20 mg109%Visit
- Ipamorelin1 cert$6.90 /mg$68.99 for 10 mg111%Visit
- SLU-PP-332$23 /mg$115 for 5 mg117%Visit
- Cagrilintide$12 /mg$123 for 10 mg124%Visit
- MOTS-c$7.70 /mg$76.99 for 10 mg140%Visit
- Selank$6.20 /mg$61.99 for 10 mg143%Visit
- KPV1 cert$7.70 /mg$76.99 for 10 mg154%Visit
- DSIP1 cert$11 /mg$53.99 for 5 mg154%Visit
- Sermorelin1 cert$12 /mg$115 for 10 mg160%Visit
- AOD-96041 cert$17 /mg$84.99 for 5 mg162%Visit
- Thymosin Alpha-11 cert$12 /mg$61.99 for 5 mg163%Visit
- Pinealon$7.70 /mg$76.99 for 10 mg164%Visit
- Tesamorelin1 cert$13 /mg$131 for 10 mg164%Visit
- Melanotan II$6.60 /mg$65.99 for 10 mg165%Visit
- IGF-1 LR31 cert$125 /mg$125 for 1 mg167%Visit
- TB-5001 cert$10 /mg$99.99 for 10 mg167%Visit
- SS-311 cert$10 /mg$99.99 for 10 mg185%Visit
- GLOW$2.71 /mg$190 for 70 mg186%Visit
- BPC-1571 cert$10 /mg$104 for 10 mg189%Visit
- KLOW$2.50 /mg$200 for 80 mg191%Visit
- GHK-Cu$1.15 /mg$115 for 100 mg192%Visit
- PT-141$8.80 /mg$87.99 for 10 mg196%Visit
- Kisspeptin1 cert$11 /mg$108 for 10 mg208%Visit
- Melanotan I$8.80 /mg$87.99 for 10 mg210%Visit
- NAD+$0.26 /mg$130 for 500 mg217%Visit
- Epithalon1 cert$9.20 /mg$91.99 for 10 mg224%Visit
- VIP$26 /mg$129 for 5 mg250%Visit
Score history
| First recorded | 64.1 · #282 Oct 2026 |
|---|---|
| Best rank | #2622 Oct 2026 |
| Today | 61.4 · #26-2.7 since first recorded |
Strengths
- Publishes 74 certificates on its own site; 15 read and recorded here
- Certificates are readable publicly, without an account
- Testing laboratory named on certificates (Vanguard Laboratory)
- Publishes a physical postal address
- Prices are visible without an account
Weaknesses
- No ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation recorded for the testing lab
- No registered legal entity is disclosed
- No independent third-party reviews located
Regulatory & enforcement record
No adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. We record authority actions — FDA warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — when located. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured.
How this score was calculatedEvery signal, its weight and the arithmetic — reconstructable by handrubric v1.11.0View calculation →Hide ↑
Each criterion is scored out of 100 over the signals we could assess, then weighted into the overall figure. Within a criterion, a signal contributes weight × merit × credit: merit is how good the recorded value is, credit is what its provenance earns — 1.00 for a value with a checkable source, 0 for a value recorded without one. A missing signal counts as a partial gap — half its weight — so a vendor that publishes what others leave blank scores higher, while a blank still costs; a value recorded without a source counts in full and earns nothing, so omitting one can never raise a score. A criterion with no data at all — track record when no independent reviews are locatable — is set aside and the remaining weights renormalised; the coverage figure, shown alongside, reports how complete the assessment is.
Testing transparency
72 / 100 · weight 26% → 18.7
Is the testing lab named? Is it ISO/IEC 17025 accredited? Are certificates of analysis lot-specific, and can anyone read them without an account?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing lab is namedA specific laboratory is identified, so the assay can be traced. | Vanguard LaboratoryLaboratory read from the certificate itself by vision extraction of the document. Evidence: “Laboratory named on the certificate document: Vanguard Laboratory.” | VerifiedStale3 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.90 / 1 |
| Lab holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditationNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 4 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 4 |
| Certificate granularityCertificates cover a batch rather than an individual lot. | Per batchBatch-level certificates described by the vendor; no lot-specific certificate was reachable. Evidence: “…10 bottles) 250 mcg. Independently tested, endotoxin screened, and supported by batch-specific Certificates of Analysis. BPC-157 Capsules 250mcg (10 Bottles) Wh…” | PublishedStale3 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 0.60 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 1.62 / 3 |
| Certificates readable without an accountAnyone, including us, can read the certificates without registering. | PublicCertificates were fetched without passing any gate. Evidence: “Certificates were fetched without passing any gate.” | VerifiedStale3 Aug 2026 | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 3.60 / 4 |
| Recognised testing laboratory15 of 15 certificates name a real, identifiable testing laboratory (a known lab, or a clearly independent one). Certificates with no named lab, or where the "lab" is just the vendor's own name, do not count — anyone can print those. | 15 / 15 recognised lab | PublishedStale25 Mar 2026 · source | 6 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 5.40 / 6 |
| Testing transparency subtotal · coverage 75% | 11.52 / 18 | |||||
Documentation depth
84.8 / 100 · weight 22% → 18.7
Does the vendor publish labeled-versus-actual milligram figures, retain historical certificates, and how large are the discrepancies we can measure?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labeled vs. actual mg publishedQuantitative fill data is published, not only a purity percentage. | PublishedLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 60 mg, assayed 57.87 mg, purity 99.8% (lot LP02202016, Vanguard Laboratory).” | VerifiedStale3 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.90 / 1 |
| Historical certificates retainedPast certificates remain accessible, so consistency over time can be checked. | RetainedSuperseded certificates remain reachable, so consistency across lots can be checked. Evidence: “74 certificate documents reachable across 21 current lots, so superseded certificates remain available.” | VerifiedStale3 Aug 2026 | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 2.70 / 3 |
| Certificates the vendor publishes74 certificates located, 15 of them indexed with readable results; full credit at six. | 74 published, 15 indexed | PublishedStale25 Mar 2026 · source | 7 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 6.30 / 7 |
| Labeled vs. actual discrepancyMean absolute deviation between labeled and assayed mass across 15 certificates. Zero scores full marks; 10% or worse scores nothing. | 9.3% mean | PublishedStale25 Mar 2026 · source | 1 | 0.07 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.06 / 1 |
| Certificate recencyThe most recent certificate is dated 2026-03-25, about 7 months ago. Certificates within a year score full marks; two years or older scores nothing. | newest 2026-03-25 | PublishedStale25 Mar 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 3.60 / 4 |
| Documentation depth subtotal · coverage 98% | 13.56 / 16 | |||||
Price & value
4.2 / 100 · weight 20% → 0.8
How the vendor’s per-milligram prices for a standard basket of common compounds compare to the market. Priced below the peer median scores higher; well above it scores lower. An overpriced vendor cannot outrank a comparably documented, better-priced one.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price vs market ($/mg)Priced about 61% above the peer median per milligram across a standard basket — weaker value than the typical vendor. | 161% of medianPrice index 160.8% of peer median across 26 compounds (1 outlier dropped): kpv $7.7/mg, dsip $10.8/mg, semax $2.57/mg, ss-31 $10/mg, ahk-cu $0.67/mg, ghk-cu $1.15/mg, mots-c $7.7/mg, pt-141 $8.8/mg. | Verified6 Oct 2026 · source | 10 | 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.42 / 10 |
| Price & value subtotal · coverage 100% | 0.42 / 10 | |||||
Track record
100 / 100 · weight 12% → 12
Adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges. Authority-issued and publicly verifiable. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored: for this market they can be manufactured.
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory & enforcement recordNo adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. Authority actions — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — are recorded here when located; self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured. | None on record | Verified24 Oct 2026 | 10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 10.00 / 10 |
| Track record subtotal · coverage 100% | 10.00 / 10 | |||||
Business transparency
49.1 / 100 · weight 12% → 5.9
Is a legal entity named, is there a physical address, and can the vendor be reached?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Named legal entityNot recorded. | — | Not recorded | 3 | 0.00 | not recorded | 0.00 / 3 |
| Physical address publishedA postal address is published. | 1489 W Palmetto Park Rd Boca Raton, FL 33486Published by the vendor. Confirmed present on the page; not independently confirmed as an operating location. Evidence: “…214 Mon-Fri 8:30AM-6:30PM EST [email protected] Typically replies same day 1489 W Palmetto Park Rd Boca Raton, FL 33486 © 2026 LicensedPeptides.com. All Ri…” | PublishedStale3 Aug 2026 · source | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 1.80 / 2 |
| Contact channelsDistinct contact routes we could identify. Full credit at two. | Telephone (855) 322-2214Contact routes published by the vendor. Not tested for a reply, so recorded as published rather than reachable. Evidence: “(855) 322-2214” | PublishedStale3 Aug 2026 · source | 2 | 0.50 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.90 / 2 |
| Business transparency subtotal · coverage 57% | 2.70 / 7 | |||||
Commercial clarity
66.1 / 100 · weight 8% → 5.3
Is pricing visible without an account, is there a stated guarantee or reship policy, and are payment methods disclosed?
| Signal | Recorded value | Provenance | Weight | Merit | Credit | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing visible without an accountPrices are published openly and can be compared. | UngatedPrices are published openly and can be compared without registering. Evidence: “…O/IEC 17025:2017 GMP-Certified USA-manufactured Same-Day Shipping Free FedEx on $200+ 99%+ Purity Guaranteed per batch HPLC + Mass Spec Independent lab verified…” | VerifiedStale3 Aug 2026 · source | 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 3.60 / 4 |
| Guarantee / reship policyWhether the published policy states an outcome in advance or leaves it to discretion. | Stated guaranteeThe published policy states an outcome in advance. Evidence: “…due to carrier issues, weather, customs, or other unforeseen factors We do not guarantee delivery dates 5. Order Tracking Once your order has shipped, you will…” | VerifiedStale3 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 2.70 / 3 |
| Payment methods disclosedDisclosed payment routes. Full credit at three. | Bank transferPayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…overnment, and educational institutions Multiple payment options: credit/debit, bank transfer, and alternative methods Why Choose Licensed Peptides? At Licensed…” | PublishedStale3 Aug 2026 · source | 1 | 0.33 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.30 / 1 |
| Payment offers buyer recourseOnly irreversible payment methods are listed (crypto, transfer, Zelle). No chargeback recourse, which is a common scam pattern. | Irreversible onlyPayment methods as listed by the vendor. Not confirmed at checkout. Evidence: “…overnment, and educational institutions Multiple payment options: credit/debit, bank transfer, and alternative methods Why Choose Licensed Peptides? At Licensed…” | PublishedStale3 Aug 2026 · source | 3 | 0.25 | 1.00 × 0.9 stale | 0.68 / 3 |
| Commercial clarity subtotal · coverage 94% | 7.28 / 11 | |||||
Total
| Criterion | Subscore | Weight | Contribution | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing transparency | 72 | 26% | 18.7 | 75% |
| Documentation depth | 84.8 | 22% | 18.7 | 98% |
| Price & value | 4.2 | 20% | 0.8 | 100% |
| Track record | 100 | 12% | 12 | 100% |
| Business transparency | 49.1 | 12% | 5.9 | 57% |
| Commercial clarity | 66.1 | 8% | 5.3 | 94% |
| Computed score | 100% | 61.4 | 87% |
Rubric v1.11.0 · 8 verified, 9 claimed, 0 unsourced, 2 not recorded, 15 stale of 19 scored signals
Community
Reviews
Reader reviews are community context only — they are never part of Licensed Peptides’s computed PepIndex score, which is built from evidence alone.
No reviews yet. .