Skip to content
PPepIndex
Rank 27 of 55Data current · 11d ago

Vertex Labs

Re-analysis located 1 certificate record(s); 1 mapped to tracked compounds.

Last verified · 21 certificate records · rubric v1.10.0 · vertexlabs.shop

PepIndex score

70.1 / 100

3.5/ 5Well documented

Data coverage

70%

Coverage is the share of scored fields we hold and corroborated for Vertex Labs. A score built on a handful of unchecked claims and a score built on forty verified data points are not the same finding, so both numbers are always published together. How coverage is computed.

good

Strengths

  • Publishes 20 lot-specific certificates across its catalogue
  • Certificates are readable publicly, without an account
  • Testing laboratory named on certificates (Freedom Diagnostics Testing)

Weaknesses

  • No ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation recorded for the testing lab
  • No registered legal entity is disclosed
  • No physical postal address is published
  • No independent third-party reviews located

Regulatory & enforcement record

No adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. We record authority actions — FDA warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — when located. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured.

Recorded data pointsEvery field with its source, capture date and whether we corroborated it6 verified4 claimed9 not recordedView all →

A tag of verified means we opened the cited source and confirmed the value; published means we recorded the vendor’s own published information, taken at face value. Both count in full; only a value with no checkable source earns nothing. Fields older than 90 days are marked stale.

Testing

Testing laboratory
Freedom Diagnostics TestingVerified28 Aug 2026sourceCertificates located on the Freedom Diagnostics public COA portal (company: Vertex).
ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation
Not recordedNot recorded
Certificate granularity
Per lotVerified18 Aug 2026sourceLot-specific certificates observed directly. Evidence: “Certificates carry lot identifiers tied to individual product variants.”
Certificate accessibility
publicVerified28 Aug 2026sourceCertificates located on the Freedom Diagnostics public COA portal (company: Vertex).
Labeled vs. actual mg published
YesVerified18 Aug 2026sourceLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 10 mg, assayed 9.73 mg, purity 99.74% (lot 072026, Analysis FreedomDiagnostics).”
Historical certificates retained
Not recordedNot recorded

Business

Website
https://vertexlabs.shopVerified18 Aug 2026sourceConfirmed reachable by the analysis run. Evidence: “Origin resolved and fetched: https://vertexlabs.shop”
Legal entity
Not recordedNot recorded
Country
Not recordedNot recorded
Physical address
Not recordedNot recorded
Contact channels
Not recordedNot recorded

Commercial

Pricing
Not recordedNot recorded
Payment methods
Not recordedNot recorded
Guarantee / reship policy
Not recordedNot recorded

Track record

Independent reviews located
Not recordedNot recorded
Mean sentiment (0–5)
Not recordedNot recorded
Complaint pattern
Not recordedNot recorded
Certificate recordsLot-level results with labeled versus assayed mass21 lots9.9% mean deviationView all →

Discrepancy is computed as the absolute difference between labeled and assayed mass, divided by the labeled mass. A vendor-published certificate is a claim; only an independently commissioned assay is treated as corroboration.

CompoundLotTestedLabLabeledAssayedDiscrepancyPuritySource
PT-1412608190845Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg9.08 mg9.2%100.0%Vendor-published
KPV2608190846Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg9.94 mg0.6%99.7%Vendor-published
Glutathione2608190847Freedom Diagnostics Testing1500 mg1534.67 mg2.3%99.7%Vendor-published
AOD-96042608190849Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg8.37 mg16.3%99.1%Vendor-published
Semax2608190851Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg11.38 mg13.8%99.9%Vendor-published
Epithalon2608190852Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg9.33 mg6.7%99.3%Vendor-published
Melanotan II2608190853Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg9.3 mg7.0%99.8%Vendor-published
Retatrutide2608190854Freedom Diagnostics Testing30 mg33.82 mg12.7%99.8%Vendor-published
Cagrilintide2608190855Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg10.48 mg4.8%99.8%Vendor-published
DSIP2608190856Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg9.3 mg7.0%99.0%Vendor-published
Retatrutide2608200008Freedom Diagnostics Testing20 mg23.29 mg16.4%100.0%Vendor-published
NAD+2607010624Freedom Diagnostics Testing500 mg518.86 mg3.8%99.9%Vendor-published
Tesamorelin2607010625Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg11.6 mg16.0%99.8%Vendor-published
Tirzepatide2607010626Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg9.73 mg2.7%99.7%Vendor-published
SS-312607010629Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg11.97 mg19.7%99.8%Vendor-published
Retatrutide2607010630Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg10.65 mg6.5%99.6%Vendor-published
GHK-Cu2607010631Freedom Diagnostics Testing100 mg96.71 mg3.3%99.9%Vendor-published
Tirzepatide072026Analysis FreedomDiagnostics10 mg9.73 mg2.7%99.7%Vendor-published
MOTS-c2606020199Freedom Diagnostics Testing10 mg10.79 mg7.9%99.8%Vendor-published
IGF-1 LR32605010111Freedom Diagnostics Testing1 mg0.72 mg28.0%99.2%Vendor-published
Retatrutide2603260285Freedom Diagnostics Testing20 mg23.96 mg19.8%99.9%Vendor-published

Compounds carried

What the research says about what Vertex Labs sells

A vendor’s score measures what it can demonstrate about its testing. It says nothing about whether the compounds it lists have evidence behind them — those are separate questions, and the digests above answer the second one.

How this score was calculatedEvery signal, its weight and the arithmetic — reconstructable by handrubric v1.10.0View calculation →

Each criterion is scored out of 100 over the signals we could assess, then weighted into the overall figure. Within a criterion, a signal contributes weight × merit × credit: merit is how good the recorded value is, credit is what its provenance earns — 1.00 for a value with a checkable source, 0 for a value recorded without one. A missing signal counts as a partial gap — half its weight — so a vendor that publishes what others leave blank scores higher, while a blank still costs; a value recorded without a source counts in full and earns nothing, so omitting one can never raise a score. A criterion with no data at all — track record when no independent reviews are locatable — is set aside and the remaining weights renormalised; the coverage figure, shown alongside, reports how complete the assessment is.

Testing transparency

87.5 / 100 · weight 26% → 28.4

Is the testing lab named? Is it ISO/IEC 17025 accredited? Are certificates of analysis lot-specific, and can anyone read them without an account?

SignalRecorded valueProvenanceWeightMeritCreditPoints
Testing lab is namedA specific laboratory is identified, so the assay can be traced.Freedom Diagnostics TestingCertificates located on the Freedom Diagnostics public COA portal (company: Vertex).Verified28 Aug 2026 · source11.001.001.00 / 1
Lab holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditationNot recorded.Not recorded40.00not recorded0.00 / 4
Certificate granularityCertificates are lot-specific, so a certificate maps to the vial received.Per lotLot-specific certificates observed directly. Evidence: “Certificates carry lot identifiers tied to individual product variants.”Verified18 Aug 2026 · source31.001.003.00 / 3
Certificates readable without an accountAnyone, including us, can read the certificates without registering.PublicCertificates located on the Freedom Diagnostics public COA portal (company: Vertex).Verified28 Aug 2026 · source41.001.004.00 / 4
Recognised testing laboratory21 of 21 certificates name a real, identifiable testing laboratory (a known lab, or a clearly independent one). Certificates with no named lab, or where the "lab" is just the vendor's own name, do not count — anyone can print those.21 / 21 recognised labPublished25 Aug 2026 · source61.001.006.00 / 6
Testing transparency subtotal · coverage 78%14.00 / 18

Documentation depth

82.8 / 100 · weight 22% → 22.8

Does the vendor publish labeled-versus-actual milligram figures, retain historical certificates, and how large are the discrepancies we can measure?

SignalRecorded valueProvenanceWeightMeritCreditPoints
Labeled vs. actual mg publishedQuantitative fill data is published, not only a purity percentage.PublishedLabeled mass is published against assayed mass, not purity alone. Evidence: “Labeled 10 mg, assayed 9.73 mg, purity 99.74% (lot 072026, Analysis FreedomDiagnostics).”Verified18 Aug 2026 · source11.001.001.00 / 1
Historical certificates retainedNot recorded.Not recorded30.00not recorded0.00 / 3
Certificates the vendor publishes21 certificates located, 21 of them indexed with readable results; full credit at six.21 indexedPublished25 Aug 2026 · source71.001.007.00 / 7
Labeled vs. actual discrepancyMean absolute deviation between labeled and assayed mass across 21 certificates. Zero scores full marks; 10% or worse scores nothing.9.9% meanPublished25 Aug 2026 · source10.011.000.01 / 1
Certificate recencyThe most recent certificate is dated 2026-08-25, about 0 months ago. Certificates within a year score full marks; two years or older scores nothing.newest 2026-08-25Published25 Aug 2026 · source41.001.004.00 / 4
Documentation depth subtotal · coverage 81%12.01 / 16

Price & value

15.7 / 100 · weight 20% → 3.9

How the vendor’s per-milligram prices for a standard basket of common compounds compare to the market. Priced below the peer median scores higher; well above it scores lower. An overpriced vendor cannot outrank a comparably documented, better-priced one.

SignalRecorded valueProvenanceWeightMeritCreditPoints
Price vs market ($/mg)Priced about 49% above the peer median per milligram across a standard basket — weaker value than the typical vendor.149% of medianPrice index 149.3% of peer median across 3 compounds (0 outliers dropped): tb-500 $9.33/mg, bpc-157 $2.67/mg, aod-9604 $18/mg.Verified31 Aug 2026 · source100.161.001.57 / 10
Price & value subtotal · coverage 100%1.57 / 10

Track record

100 / 100 · weight 12% → 15

Adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges. Authority-issued and publicly verifiable. Self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored: for this market they can be manufactured.

SignalRecorded valueProvenanceWeightMeritCreditPoints
Regulatory & enforcement recordNo adverse regulatory or enforcement action on record. Authority actions — warning letters, import alerts, seizures, criminal charges — are recorded here when located; self-reported reviews are deliberately not scored, because for this market they can be manufactured.None on recordVerified8 Sept 2026101.001.0010.00 / 10
Track record subtotal · coverage 100%10.00 / 10

Business transparency

Not assessed — excluded from the score

Is a legal entity named, is there a physical address, and can the vendor be reached?

SignalRecorded valueProvenanceWeightMeritCreditPoints
Named legal entityNot recorded.Not recorded30.00not recorded0.00 / 3
Physical address publishedNot recorded.Not recorded20.00not recorded0.00 / 2
Contact channelsNot recorded.Not recorded20.00not recorded0.00 / 2
Business transparency subtotal · coverage 0%0.00 / 7

Commercial clarity

Not assessed — excluded from the score

Is pricing visible without an account, is there a stated guarantee or reship policy, and are payment methods disclosed?

SignalRecorded valueProvenanceWeightMeritCreditPoints
Pricing visible without an accountNot recorded.Not recorded40.00not recorded0.00 / 4
Guarantee / reship policyNot recorded.Not recorded30.00not recorded0.00 / 3
Payment methods disclosedNot recorded.Not recorded10.00not recorded0.00 / 1
Payment offers buyer recourseNot recorded.Not recorded30.00not recorded0.00 / 3
Commercial clarity subtotal · coverage 0%0.00 / 11

Total

CriterionSubscoreWeightContributionCoverage
Testing transparency87.526%28.478%
Documentation depth82.822%22.881%
Price & value15.720%3.9100%
Track record10012%15100%
Business transparency12%excluded0%
Commercial clarity8%excluded0%
Computed score100%70.170%

Rubric v1.10.0 · 6 verified, 4 claimed, 0 unsourced, 9 not recorded, 0 stale of 19 scored signals

Community

Reviews

Reader reviews are community context only — they are never part of Vertex Labs’s computed PepIndex score, which is built from evidence alone.

No reviews yet. .